CODEWITHSUNDEEP
pythonnew-operatorsuper
Anvesh Yalamarthy
Anvesh Yalamarthy

Reputation: 1693

Why doesn't super.__new__ need argument but instance.__new__ needs?

Trying to understand super and __new__

Here goes my code:

class Base(object):
    def __new__(cls,foo):
        if cls is Base:
            if foo == 1:
                #  return Base.__new__(Child) complains not enough arguments
                return Base.__new__(Child,foo)
            if foo == 2:
                # how does this work without giving foo?
                return super(Base,cls).__new__(Child)  
        else:
            return super(Base,cls).__new__(cls,foo)

    def __init__(self,foo):
        pass 
class Child(Base):
    def __init__(self,foo):
        Base.__init__(self,foo)    
a = Base(1)  # returns instance of class Child
b = Base(2)  # returns instance of class Child
c = Base(3)  # returns instance of class Base
d = Child(1)  # returns instance of class Child

Why doesn't super.__new__ need an argument while __new__ needs it?

Python: 2.7.11

Upvotes: 0

Views: 484

Answers (1)

Aran-Fey
Aran-Fey

Reputation: 43166

super().__new__ is not the same function as Base.__new__. super().__new__ is object.__new__. object.__new__ doesn't require a foo argument, but Base.__new__ does.

>>> Base.__new__
<function Base.__new__ at 0x000002243340A730>
>>> super(Base, Base).__new__
<built-in method __new__ of type object at 0x00007FF87AD89EC0>
>>> object.__new__
<built-in method __new__ of type object at 0x00007FF87AD89EC0>

What may be confusing you is this line:

return super(Base,cls).__new__(cls, foo)

This calls object.__new__(cls, foo). That's right, it passes a foo argument to object.__new__ even though object.__new__ doesn't need it. This is allowed in python 2, but would crash in python 3. It would be best to remove the foo argument from there.

Upvotes: 1

Related Questions