Reputation: 4299
I searched a lot on the Web and SO, asked in reactiflux chat, but didn't found a clean and non-hack-looking way of rendering some component depending of route/path.
Let's say I have the <Header />
which should be shown on some pages and should be hidden on other ones.
For sure I can use this string in Header component
if (props.location.pathname.indexOf('/pageWithoutAHeader') > -1) return null
That's totally fine, if /pageWithoutAHeader
is the unique. If I need same functionality for 5 pages it become this:
if (props.location.pathname.indexOf('/pageWithoutAHeader1') > -1) return null
if (props.location.pathname.indexOf('/pageWithoutAHeader2') > -1) return null
if (props.location.pathname.indexOf('/pageWithoutAHeader3') > -1) return null
Yes, I can store routes in the array and write a loop, which will be more code-reusable. But is it a best and the most elegant way to handle this use case?
I believe that it can be even buggy, for example if I don't render header for a page with a route /xyz
and I have routes with UUIDs, like /projects/:id
, and id=xyzfoo
, so /projects/xyzfoo
won't show a header but it should.
Upvotes: 7
Views: 7931
Reputation: 705
A scenario that often pops up for me is certain pages in the database having Header = false or Page Title = false. A good solution for that would be a Context.
import React, { createContext, useContext, useState, useEffect } from "react";
import { Switch, Route } from "react-router-dom";
const AppContext = createContext({});
const Header = () => {
const { headerActive } = useContext(AppContext);
if (!headerActive) {
return null;
}
return (
<header>I'm a header</header>
);
}
const PageWithHeader = () => {
const { setHeaderActive } = useContext(AppContext);
useEffect(() => {
setHeaderActive(true);
},[setHeaderActive]);
return (
<div>Page with header</div>
);
}
const PageWithoutHeader = () => {
const { setHeaderActive } = useContext(AppContext);
useEffect(() => {
setHeaderActive(false);
},[setHeaderActive]);
return (
<div>Page without header</div>
);
}
export const App = () => {
const [headerActive, setHeaderActive] = useState(true);
return (
<AppContext.Provider value={{ headerActive, setHeaderActive }}>
<Header />
<Switch>
<Route path="page-1">
<PageWithHeader />
</Route>
<Route path="page-2">
<PageWithoutHeader />
</Route>
<Switch>
</AppContext.Provider>
);
}
You could also simplify it further by using a custom hook. Something like:
export const useHeader = (active) => {
const { headerActive, setHeaderActive } = useContext(AppContext);
useEffect(() => {
if (active !== undefined) {
setHeaderActive(active);
}
},[setHeaderActive, active]);
return headerActive;
}
Then in the original components:
const Header = () => {
const headerActive = useHeader();
if (!headerActive) {
return null;
}
return (
<header>I'm a header</header>
);
}
...
const PageWithoutHeader = () => {
useHeader(false);
return (
<div>Page without header</div>
);
}
You could also get fancy and use the useLocation hook paired with useRef to keep track of the previous and current pathnames so you can have a default state without needing to declare useHeader in every page.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 105
You can use render attribute of the Route. Example:
<Route path='/pageWithoutHeader' render={() => <Page1 />} />
<Route path='pageWithHeader' render={() =>
<Header/>
<Page2 />}
/>
This method is better than using the header component inside the Page.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 4997
You can list all routes without a header first and group others in additional switch:
...
<Switch>
<Route path="/noheader1" ... />
<Route path="/noheader2" ... />
<Route path="/noheader3" ... />
<Route component={HeaderRoutes} />
</Switch>
...
HeaderRoutes = props => (
<React.Fragment>
<Header/>
<Switch>
<Route path="/withheader1" ... />
<Route path="/withheader2" ... />
<Route path="/withheader3" ... />
</Switch>
</React.Fragment>
)
From the documentation:
Routes without a path always match.
Unfortunately this solution might have a problem with "not found" page. It should be placed at the end of the HeaderRoutes
and will be rendered with a Header
.
Dhara's solution doesn't have such problem. But it might not work well with Switch
if React Router internals change:
All children of a
<Switch>
should be<Route>
or<Redirect>
elements. Only the first child to match the current location will be rendered.
HOC over Route
is not a Route
itself. But it should work fine because current codebase in fact expects any React.Element
with the same props semantics as <Route>
and <Redirect>
have.
Upvotes: 6
Reputation: 352
In order to achieve DRY rule(avoid code repetition) and implements the conditional rendering depending on routes, you should work on the following structure:
step 1) Create the layout(HOC) which returns the given component with the <Header/>
and export it
import React from "react"
import { Route } from "react-router-dom"
import Header from "./Header"
export const HeaderLayout = ({component: Component, ...rest}) => (
<Route {...rest} render={(props) => (
<>
<Header/>
<Component {...props} />
</>
)} />
)
Step 2) import layout and use it
import React, { Component } from 'react'
import { BrowserRouter, Route, Switch } from "react-router-dom"
import Test1 from './Test1';
import Test2 from './Test2';
import { HeaderLayout } from './HeaderLayout';
export default class Main extends Component {
render() {
return (
<BrowserRouter>
<Switch>
<HeaderLayout path="/test1" component={Test1} />
<Route path="/test2" component={Test2}/>
</Switch>
</BrowserRouter>
)
}
}
Output :
Conclusion :
So, whenever you want to include header component along with your route defined component use <HeaderLayout />
and if you don't want to use header then simply use <Route />
to hide header in your page.
Upvotes: 7
Reputation: 5199
I think you are looking at this the wrong way. So composability is the number one trait when thinking in React. A header is a reusable component which can be dropped anywhere you want!
Thinking in this way will provide you with multiple options.
Let's say you have several page routes that you have designed for your application. A header is a child component of any of those pages who use it!
function AppRouter() {
return (
<Router>
<div>
<nav>
<ul>
<li>
<Link to="/">Home</Link>
</li>
<li>
<Link to="/about/">About</Link>
</li>
<li>
<Link to="/users/">Users</Link>
</li>
</ul>
</nav>
<Route path="/" exact component={Index} />
<Route path="/about/" component={About} />
<Route path="/users/" component={Users} />
</div>
</Router>
);
}
Now within each page you want the header you can go and just introduce the Header Component wherever necessary.
export default function Index(){
return (
<React.Fragment>
<Header/>
<div> ... Index Content </div>
</React.Fragment>
);
}
export default function About(){
return (
<React.Fragment>
//I don't need a header here.
<div> ... Index Content </div>
</React.Fragment>
);
}
An even more elegant but a bit more complex approach would be to introduce a Higher order component. This would make your intentions more clear on adding headers at the route level!
function withHeader(Page){
return class extends React.Component {
render() {
// Wraps the input component in a container, without mutating it.
return (
<React.Fragment>
<Header/>
<Page {...this.props} />);
</React.Fragment>
}
}
}
function AppRouter() {
return (
<Router>
<div>
<nav>
<ul>
<li>
<Link to="/">Home</Link>
</li>
<li>
<Link to="/about/">About</Link>
</li>
<li>
<Link to="/users/">Users</Link>
</li>
</ul>
</nav>
<Route path="/" exact component={withHeader(Index)} />
<Route path="/about/" component={About} />
<Route path="/users/" component={Users} />
</div>
</Router>
);
}
Upvotes: 4
Reputation: 3377
Include this data about the header as a route parameter or a query.
/projects/:headerBool/:id
Or:
/projects/:id?header=false
Then you can access it via props.match or props.location.
Upvotes: 2