Reputation: 722
In an "old way" of managing modules in Node.JS (CommonJS modules) you can do something like this:
Example of Express.js route: app.use('/user', require("./user"));
How to do this when I am using ES6 Modules (import, export) and transcribing by Node.JS server by babel?
I can't just do: app.use('/user', import {user} from './user');
Upvotes: 11
Views: 17616
Reputation: 192
You can achieve what you want using the following syntax:
app.use('/user', (await import('./user')).user)
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 113
There is a way to do dynamic inline imports in node, detailed here: https://javascript.info/modules-dynamic-imports
This code has worked for me:
let {default: foo} = await import('./foo.js');
Here is a working example of a function I wrote as part of a db migration tool in node.
const getMigrations = async (path) => {
const migrateDir = await fs.readdirSync(path);
const migrations = await Promise.all(migrateDir.map(async (filename) => {
let {default: migration} = await import(`${path}/${filename}`);
return migration;
}));
migrations.sort((a, b) => {
return a.seq - b.seq;
});
return migrations;
};
Where an example migration is like:
export default {
seq: 1.1,
label: 'create user table',
sql: `
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS user;
CREATE TABLE user
(
...
);
`
};
I am using node v12.18.4 with "type": "module" in my package.json. When I run the script, I get a warning that the ESM module loader is experimental, but it works. However, there is a note on the page linked to above that says:
Dynamic imports work in regular scripts, they don’t require script type="module".
I hope this helps. I believe you should be able to apply this to your problem.
Upvotes: 4
Reputation: 1649
Try separating it out into multiple expressions - import
(as well as export
) are not available at the same lexical level as you are trying to use it the example:
import { user } from './user'
...
app.use('/user', user)
Upvotes: 1