CODEWITHSUNDEEP
jsongroovy
huangbiubiu
huangbiubiu

Reputation: 1271

Best way to parse more than one json with JsonSlurper

I'm using Groovy JsonSlurper parsing json. I found that I should initialize a JsonSlurper instance before I call parseText() method.

  1. When I have multiple json objects (e.g. a LinkedList<String> with n json texts) to parse, should I initialize n JsonSlurper or initialize a JsonSlurper and call its parseText n times?

  2. When I use JsonSlurper on a Web Server, is that the best practice to just maintain one global JsonSlurper instance and use it everywhere? Or initialize an instance every time I receive an HTTP request?

Or to be more clear, what the constructor of JsonSlurper do?

Upvotes: 2

Views: 1209

Answers (1)

Szymon Stepniak
Szymon Stepniak

Reputation: 42264

You can think of JsonSlurper as a facade for creating a concrete JSON parser implementation. For instance, the default parser that gets created anytime you invoke parse() or parseText() methods is JsonParserCharArray. If you take a look at JsonSlurper source code you will see that it encapsulates the following five private fields:

    private int maxSizeForInMemory = 2000000;
    private boolean chop = false;
    private boolean lazyChop = true;
    private boolean checkDates = true;

    private JsonParserType type = JsonParserType.CHAR_BUFFER;

When you create JsonSlurper you use these default values, but for any specific use case, you can modify them to fit best your needs.

Answering your first question, it does make sense to instantiate a single JsonSlurper and use to parse all Strings while iterating the list. Something like :

def slurper = new JsonSlurper()
def parsed = jsons.collect { slurper.parseText(it) }

If your list is size 1000 let's say, it will create a single JsonSlurper object and 1000 JsonParser objects, instead of 1000 JsonSlurper objects and 1000 JsonParser objects.

Answering your second question, there is no good context-free answer to this question. It highly depends on a few factors like the server load, JSON serialization/deserialization frequency, available memory, JsonSlurper use cases and so on. You actually have to monitor your application and experiment with both approaches to see what works better for you. For instance, if your application handles HTTP requests constantly and it constantly creates the same JsonSlurper and uses exactly the same default values, then you might consider creating a singleton-like bean that injects the same instance of JsonSlurper to handle every HTTP request. But on the other hand, if your application does not suffer from tons of parallel requests and it handles a few sequential requests on average, then keeping a JsonSlurper object in memory for all the time may sound like a wasteful resources utilization.

Upvotes: 2

Related Questions