Reputation: 4601
I have a generic method, I give it any object of type T and a list of properties and it will return the object with the properties defined by the list set to null
Here's my code
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var orderDto = new OrderDto();
orderDto.Nominal = "1";
orderDto.OrderId = "2";
orderDto.Type = "3";
var clean = FieldCleaner.Clean(orderDto, "OrderId");
}
}
public class FieldCleaner
{
public static T Clean<T>(T dto, params string[] properties) // I want in compilation time, have autocompletion that tell user the value of properties can only be a property name of the type T
{
var propertyInfos = dto.GetType().GetProperties();
foreach (var propertyInfo in propertyInfos)
{
foreach (var property in properties)
{
if (propertyInfo.Name == property)
{
propertyInfo.SetValue(dto, null);
}
}
}
return dto;
}
}
public class OrderDto
{
public string OrderId { get; set; }
public string Nominal { get; set; }
public string Type { get; set; }
}
My question is in the comment above in the code. I don't like the type string[], I want something like a keyof T in typescript
Im using last C# version with last .NET core
Upvotes: 0
Views: 76
Reputation: 54618
While the following answer does what you want, there really isn't a point because it's just unnecessary. If you have to specify the property, you might as well just set it directly.
Here is probably as close as you can get. I don't believe you can use params
because that would require all TProp
to be the same type.
In visual studio when you get to the period, you'll get intellisense:
using System;
using System.Linq.Expressions;
using System.Reflection;
public class Program
{
public static void Main()
{
var orderDto = new OrderDto
{
Id = 1,
Name = "Name",
CreatedOn = DateTime.UtcNow,
CompletedOn = DateTime.UtcNow.AddMinutes(30),
Misc = Guid.NewGuid()
};
Console.WriteLine($"{orderDto.Id} {orderDto.Name} {orderDto.CreatedOn} {orderDto.CompletedOn} {orderDto.Misc}");
orderDto.DefaultFor(x => x.Id, x => x.Name, x => x.CreatedOn, x => x.CompletedOn);
Console.WriteLine($"{orderDto.Id} {orderDto.Name} {orderDto.CreatedOn} {orderDto.CompletedOn} {orderDto.Misc}");
}
}
public static class ObjectExtensions
{
public static void DefaultFor<TObject, TProp1, TProp2, TProp3, TProp4>(this TObject instance,
Expression<Func<TObject, TProp1>> selector1,
Expression<Func<TObject, TProp2>> selector2,
Expression<Func<TObject, TProp3>> selector3,
Expression<Func<TObject, TProp4>> selector4)
where TObject : class
{
DefaultFor(instance, selector1, selector2, selector3);
DefaultFor(instance, selector4);
}
public static void DefaultFor<TObject, TProp1, TProp2, TProp3>(this TObject instance,
Expression<Func<TObject, TProp1>> selector1,
Expression<Func<TObject, TProp2>> selector2,
Expression<Func<TObject, TProp3>> selector3)
where TObject : class
{
DefaultFor(instance, selector1, selector2);
DefaultFor(instance, selector3);
}
public static void DefaultFor<TObject, TProp1, TProp2>(this TObject instance,
Expression<Func<TObject, TProp1>> selector1,
Expression<Func<TObject, TProp2>> selector2)
where TObject : class
{
DefaultFor(instance, selector1);
DefaultFor(instance, selector2);
}
public static void DefaultFor<TObject, TProp>(this TObject instance, Expression<Func<TObject, TProp>> selector)
where TObject : class
{
if (instance == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException();
var memberExpression = (MemberExpression)selector.Body;
var property = (PropertyInfo)memberExpression.Member;
property.SetValue(instance, default(TProp));
}
}
public class OrderDto
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public DateTime CreatedOn { get; set; }
public DateTime? CompletedOn { get; set; }
public Guid Misc { get; set; }
}
Output:
1 Name 3/29/2019 5:14:06 AM 3/29/2019 5:44:06 AM 3800be41-7fe1-42da-ada5-4fe33ac04a84
0 1/1/0001 12:00:00 AM 3800be41-7fe1-42da-ada5-4fe33ac04a84
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 415600
To paraphrase a bit:
// I want an auto-completion list in Visual Studio to tell the programmer what properties of T are available
The problem is the type T
could be anything. You have to be able to use this code in a completely different assembly, where neither Visual Studio nor the compiler know about your T
at compile time.
I won't say it's impossible. Visual Studio is very extensible, especially now we have Roslyn. But that is what you'll have to do: a custom Visual Studio extension using Roslyn to analyze the code and provide the completion list. This isn't built in to the platform.
Upvotes: 1