Reputation: 205
I want to check if two types are of the same template. As an example I want the following snippet of code to return true
because both objects are vectors despite the inner elements being of different types.
It's important that the check is made at compile time (that's why the function is constexpr).
#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>
#include <vector>
template <typename Container1, typename Container2> constexpr bool CheckTypes(Container1 c1, Container2 c2)
{
return std::is_same<Container1,Container2>::value;
}
int main()
{
std::vector<int> v1(100,0);
std::vector<double> v2(100,0);
std::cout << CheckTypes(v1,v2);
}
Upvotes: 10
Views: 2526
Reputation: 3640
In case you would like to check if two template template classes are the same without specializing them:
template<template<typename...> class ATT, template<typename...> class BTT>
struct is_same_tt : std::false_type {};
template<template<typename...> class TT>
struct is_same_tt<TT, TT> : std::true_type {};
// example
static_assert(is_same_tt<std::tuple, std::tuple>());
static_assert(!is_same_tt<std::vector, std::list>());
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 40080
Here you go:
template <class T, class U>
struct are_same_template : std::is_same<T, U>
{};
template <template<class...> class T, class T1, class T2>
struct are_same_template<T<T1>, T<T2>> : std::true_type
{};
template <class T, class U>
constexpr bool CheckTypes(T, U)
{
return are_same_template<T, U>::value;
}
Demo: http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/8533c694968f4dbb
This works by providing a specialization of are_same_template
that discard the template argument types:
template <template<class...> class T, class T1, class T2>
struct are_same_template<T<T1>, T<T2>>
Even if T1
and T2
differ (the template argument types), are_same_template
is a true type:
are_same_template<T<T1>, T<T2>> : std::true_type
About template<class...>
instead of template<class>
: this is to accomodate the fact than std::
containers have implicit template arguments. Thanks to ConstantinosGlynos for making me aware of it.
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 2870
You can but it take a little of metaprog :
#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>
#include <vector>
#include <set>
template <typename Container1, typename Container2>
struct CheckTypes_impl
{
constexpr static bool check (Container1 , Container2 ) { return false; }
};
template <
template <class...> class Container1, class... args1 , class... args2 >
struct CheckTypes_impl<Container1<args1...>,Container1<args2...>>
{
constexpr static bool check (Container1<args1...> , Container1<args2...> ) { return true; }
};
template <
template <class...> class Container1,
class ... args1,
template <class...> class Container2,
class ... args2
> constexpr bool CheckTypes(Container1<args1...> c1, Container2<args2...> c2)
{
return CheckTypes_impl<Container1<args1...>,Container2<args2...>>::check(c1,c2);
}
int main()
{
std::vector<int> v1(100,0);
std::vector<double> v2(100,0);
std::set<int> s;
std::cout << CheckTypes(v1,v2) << std::endl;
std::cout << CheckTypes(v1,s) << std::endl;
}
run : https://wandbox.org/permlink/OTuQfl7UBlbxgtCO
Update : You need " template class Container1, class..." because vector don't take 1 template param, but 2. In the general case you don't know how many default parameters will be used
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 4050
Check this post. They provide a way to check if something is a specialization of a template class:
template<typename Test, template<typename...> class Ref>
struct is_specialization : std::false_type {};
template<template<typename...> class Ref, typename... Args>
struct is_specialization<Ref<Args...>, Ref>: std::true_type {};
And probably do something like this to keep your original interface:
template <typename Container1, typename Container2>
constexpr bool CheckTypes(Container1 c1, Container2 c2) {
return is_specialization<Container1, std::vector>::value && is_specialization<Container2, std::vector>::value;
}
So you can do something like this:
int main() {
std::vector<int> v1(100,0);
std::vector<double> v2(100,0);
std::cout << CheckTypes(v1,v2);
return 0;
}
Upvotes: 0