Reputation: 412
My question is very similar to those:
However, they don't give the answer to my particular case. Although eventually, I solved the problem but I don't feel this solution to be good and would appreciate if there are better ways to do this. I faced the sort-problem for the first time and would like to understand it better.
From this (modelled) input:
<root>
<measure attribute="attr">
<other n="234">-</other>
<other n="345">-</other>
<element n="2"/>
<element n="1"/>
<element n="3"/>
<other attr="abc">-</other>
</measure>
<measure>
<other n="234">-</other>
<other n="345"><node/></other>
<element n="3"/>
<element n="1"/>
<element n="2"/>
<other attr="abc">-</other>
</measure>
</root>
I want to get this result:
<root>
<measure>
<other n="234">-</other>
<other n="345">-</other>
<element n="1"/>
<element n="2"/>
<element n="3"/>
<other attr="abc">-</other>
</measure>
<measure>
<other n="234">-</other>
<other n="345">
<node/>
</other>
<node/>
<element n="1"/>
<element n="2"/>
<element n="3"/>
<other attr="abc">-</other>
</measure>
</root>
So I want to get particular elements (<element/>
) to be sorted in the relation to each other, but other elements should stay on their positions.
First I tried this: https://xsltfiddle.liberty-development.net/6r5Gh3h/3
<xsl:stylesheet version="3.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:output encoding="UTF-8" indent="yes" method="xml"/>
<xsl:strip-space elements="*"/>
<xsl:mode on-no-match="shallow-copy"/>
<xsl:template match="measure">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:apply-templates select="@*, node()[local-name()!='element']"/>
<xsl:apply-templates select="element">
<xsl:sort order="ascending" select="@n"/>
</xsl:apply-templates>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
But it changed the order of the elements.
This solution makes the desired output but are there better ways to do this?
https://xsltfiddle.liberty-development.net/94rmq6j
<xsl:stylesheet exclude-result-prefixes="xs math map array" version="3.0" xmlns:array="http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/array" xmlns:map="http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/map" xmlns:math="http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/math" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:output encoding="UTF-8" indent="yes" method="xml"/>
<xsl:strip-space elements="*"/>
<xsl:mode on-no-match="shallow-copy"/>
<xsl:template match="measure">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:variable name="sortedEls">
<xsl:perform-sort select="child::element">
<xsl:sort data-type="number" order="ascending" select="@n"/>
</xsl:perform-sort>
</xsl:variable>
<xsl:for-each select="descendant::*">
<xsl:choose>
<xsl:when test="local-name() = 'element' and not(following-sibling::element)">
<xsl:sequence select="$sortedEls"/>
</xsl:when>
<xsl:otherwise>
<xsl:if test="local-name() != 'element'">
<xsl:apply-templates select="."/>
</xsl:if>
</xsl:otherwise>
</xsl:choose>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
Upvotes: 1
Views: 7938
Reputation: 167716
If you only want to sort adjacent element
elements then I think processing elements with xsl:for-each-group select="*" group-adjacent="boolean(self::element)
allows you to identify them and then inside of the for-each-group
you can process the groups of element
elements sorted based on the attribute and the other elements without sorting:
<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:math="http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/math"
xmlns:map="http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/map"
xmlns:array="http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/array"
exclude-result-prefixes="xs math map array"
version="3.0">
<xsl:mode on-no-match="shallow-copy"/>
<xsl:output indent="yes"/>
<xsl:template match="measure">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:for-each-group select="*" group-adjacent="boolean(self::element)">
<xsl:choose>
<xsl:when test="current-grouping-key()">
<xsl:apply-templates select="current-group()">
<xsl:sort select="xs:decimal(@n)"/>
</xsl:apply-templates>
</xsl:when>
<xsl:otherwise>
<xsl:apply-templates select="current-group()"/>
</xsl:otherwise>
</xsl:choose>
</xsl:for-each-group>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
https://xsltfiddle.liberty-development.net/bFN1y9m/
If you want to sort all element
child elements and swap them around based on the original position of all element
children then I think the following, which first computes the sorted sequence of attribute values and then gives each element to be sorted the position of the original input order, helps:
<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
exclude-result-prefixes="#all"
version="3.0">
<xsl:mode on-no-match="shallow-copy"/>
<xsl:output indent="yes"/>
<xsl:template match="measure">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:variable name="original-order" as="xs:string*" select="node()!generate-id()"/>
<xsl:variable name="elems" as="element(element)*" select="element"/>
<xsl:variable name="sort-order" as="xs:decimal*" select="sort(element/xs:decimal(@n))"/>
<xsl:apply-templates>
<xsl:sort
select="if (. instance of element(element))
then
let $sort-pos := index-of($sort-order, xs:decimal(@n)),
$orig-el := $elems[$sort-pos]
return
index-of($original-order, $orig-el!generate-id())
else position()"/>
</xsl:apply-templates>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
https://xsltfiddle.liberty-development.net/bFN1y9m/1
For XSLT 3 processors with higher-order function sort
support (e.g. Saxon PE or EE or Altova) I think this can be improved to use a sequence of elements or element ids for the original sort order:
<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
exclude-result-prefixes="#all"
version="3.0">
<xsl:mode on-no-match="shallow-copy"/>
<xsl:template match="measure">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:variable name="original-order" as="xs:string*" select="node()!generate-id()"/>
<xsl:variable name="elems" as="element(element)*" select="element"/>
<xsl:variable name="sort-order" as="xs:decimal*" select="sort(element/xs:decimal(@n))"/>
<xsl:apply-templates>
<xsl:sort
select="if (. instance of element(element))
then
let $sort-pos := index-of($sort-order, xs:decimal(@n)),
$orig-el := $elems[$sort-pos]
return
index-of($original-order, $orig-el!generate-id())
else position()"/>
</xsl:apply-templates>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
That way I think the approach should work even if there are various elements with the same sort key value (e.g. @n
value).
Upvotes: 0