Reputation: 3513
If I run the code below, I get the following values for the tm and gm structures with the "cambria Math" font:
tm.tmHeight = 161
tm.tmAscent = 90
tm.tmDescent = 71
and
gm.gmBlackBoxY = 14
The values in tm
are clearly in error! The gmBlackBoxY
seems to be correct.
Now, if I run the code with
lfFaceName = "Arial"
I get for tm
and gm
the following values, which are correct:
tm.tmHeight = 33
tm.tmAscent = 27
tm.tmDescent = 6
and
gm.gmBlackBoxY = 15
Code:
int iLogPixelsY;
iLogPixelsY = GetDeviceCaps(hdc,LOGPIXELSY);
LOGFONT lf;
int iPts;
iPts = 22;
memset(&lf, 0, sizeof(LOGFONT));
lf.lfHeight = -iPts * iLogPixelsY / 72;
lf.lfWeight = FW_NORMAL;
lf.lfItalic = 0;
lf.lfCharSet = 0;
lf.lfOutPrecision = OUT_TT_ONLY_PRECIS;
wcscpy(lf.lfFaceName, L"Cambria Math");
HFONT hFont;
hFont = CreateFontIndirect(&lf);
hFont = (HFONT)SelectObject(hdc, hFont);
TCHAR tx;
tx = 'a';
TEXTMETRIC tm;
GetTextMetrics(hdc, &tm);
GLYPHMETRICS gm;
GetGlyphOutline(hdc, tx, GGO_METRICS, &gm, 0, NULL, &gmat);
Could anyone explain the apparent incorrectness in obtaining the TEXTMETRIC
structure for a "Cambria Math" font ?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 1303
Reputation: 8230
Incorrectness in your code is does not apply to obtaining TEXTMETRIC structure (excluding, that you use TCHARs, CHARs and WCHARs functions and variables in same code).
tm.tmHeight == 161;
tm.tmAscent == 90;
tm.tmDescent == 71;
tm.tmInternalLeading == 132;
Above lines do not have any errors!!!
tm.tmHeight == tm.tmAscent + tm.tmDescent;
tm.tmHeight == tm.tmInternalLeading + MulDiv(22,GetDeviceCaps(hdc,LOGPIXELSY),72);
"Cambria Math" is designed with these parameters!
Go to the link http://www.ascenderfonts.com/font/cambria-regular.aspx Change the font size to 22pt (or whatever) and look at the difference between of top and bottom margins for the font "Cambria" and font "Cambria Math".
Upvotes: 1