Reputation: 13551
I've put different values into this function and observed the output. But I can't find a predictable pattern in what is being outputed.
Then I tried digging through the function itself, but its confusing because it can do a number of different calculations.
According to the Docs:
Compute the distance matrix from a vector array X and optional Y.
I see it returns a matrix of height and width equal to the number of nested lists inputted, implying that it is comparing each one.
But otherwise I'm having a tough time understanding what its doing and where the values are coming from.
Examples I've tried:
pairwise_distances([[1]], metric='correlation')
>>> array([[0.]])
pairwise_distances([[1], [1]], metric='correlation')
>>> array([[ 0., nan],
>>> [nan, 0.]])
# returns same as last input although input values differ
pairwise_distances([[1], [2]], metric='correlation')
>>> array([[ 0., nan],
>>> [nan, 0.]])
pairwise_distances([[1,2], [1,2]], metric='correlation')
>>> array([[0.00000000e+00, 2.22044605e-16],
>>> [2.22044605e-16, 0.00000000e+00]])
# returns same as last input although input values differ
# I incorrectly expected more distance because input values differ more
pairwise_distances([[1,2], [1,3]], metric='correlation')
>>> array([[0.00000000e+00, 2.22044605e-16],
>>> [2.22044605e-16, 0.00000000e+00]])
Computing correlation distance with Scipy
I don't understand where the sklearn 2.22044605e-16
value is coming from if scipy returns 0.0
for the same inputs.
# Scipy
import scipy
scipy.spatial.distance.correlation([1,2], [1,2])
>>> 0.0
# Sklearn
pairwise_distances([[1,2], [1,2]], metric='correlation')
>>> array([[0.00000000e+00, 2.22044605e-16],
>>> [2.22044605e-16, 0.00000000e+00]])
I'm not looking for a high level explanation but an example of how the numbers are calculated.
Upvotes: 3
Views: 4065
Reputation: 13700
I totally understand the confusion.
Correlation is calulated on vectors, and sklearn did a non-trivial conversion of a scalar to a vector of size 1.
the result of
from sklearn.metrics import pairwise_distances
from scipy.spatial.distance import correlation
pairwise_distances([u,v,w], metric='correlation')
Is a matrix M
of shape (len([u,v,w]),len([u,v,w]))=(3,3)
, where:
M[0,0] = correlation(u,u)
M[0,1] = correlation(u,v)
M[0,2] = correlation(u,w)
M[1,0] = correlation(v,u)
M[1,1] = correlation(v,v)
M[1,2] = correlation(v,w)
M[2,0] = correlation(w,u)
M[2,1] = correlation(w,v)
M[2,2] = correlation(w,w)
you were looking at correlation([u,v,w], [u,v,w])
that has a valid value only if u
,v
and w
are scalars.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 16966
pairwise_distances
internally call the distance.pdist()
, when y
is None
(which means we want to compute the distance matrix for each vector in X)
The implementation would be similar to the following:
X = np.array([[1,2], [1,2]])
import numpy as np
from numpy.linalg import norm
X2 = X - X.mean(axis=1, keepdims=True)
u, v =[*X2]
1 - (sum(u*v)/(norm(u) * norm(v)))
#2.220446049250313e-16
But scipy.spatial.distance.correlation
implementation differs in the latest version
If we set the weights to None, the following snippet is the simplified version of it:
u, v = np.array([1,2]), np.array([1,2])
umu = np.average(u)
vmu = np.average(v)
u = u - umu
v = v - vmu
uv = np.average(u * v)
uu = np.average(np.square(u))
vv = np.average(np.square(v))
dist = 1.0 - uv / np.sqrt(uu * vv)
dist
#0
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 1435
import sklearn
X = [[1, 2, 3, 4], [2, 2, 4, 4], [4, 3, 2, 1]]
D = sklearn.metrics.pairwise_distances(X, metric='correlation')
print(D)
Output:
[[0. 0.10557281 2. ]
[0.10557281 0. 1.89442719]
[2. 1.89442719 0. ]]
D
is a distance matrix such that D{i, j} is the distance between the ith and jth vectors of the given matrix X
.
import scipy
X = [[1, 2, 3, 4], [2, 2, 4, 4], [4, 3, 2, 1]]
c_00 = scipy.spatial.distance.correlation(X[0], X[0]) # c_00 = 0.0
c_01 = scipy.spatial.distance.correlation(X[0], X[1]) # c_01 = 0.10557280900008414
c_02 = scipy.spatial.distance.correlation(X[0], X[2]) # c_02 = 2.0
I don't understand where the sklearn
2.22044605e-16
value is coming from if scipy returns0.0
for the same inputs.
This is probably a round-off error.
import numpy as np
epsilon = np.finfo(float).eps
print(epsilon)
Outputs:
2.220446049250313e-16 # This value is machine dependent
You could use np.isclose
to round extremely small values to 0.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 1254
The distance metrics can be found here: https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/spatial.distance.html
And correlation is specifically here:
The correlation distance between u and v, is defined as
Upvotes: 1