dgt
dgt

Reputation: 1082

VAVR compose Try and List

I'm trying to figure out what are the idiomatic ways of using VAVR's Try. The use case I'm looking at has to following steps:
- fetch a list of shoes (the invocation can throw a checked exception)
- clean each shoe (the invocation can throw a checked exception)
- restore each shoe (the invocation can throw a checked exception)
- return a list of cleaned/restored shoes

Here is my sample toy code where processRequest method buys n pairs of shoes, cleans & restores them; prints errors if any:

// definitions
ShoeStore java.util.List<Shoe> buy(int numberOfPairs) throws OutOfStockException;
ShoeCleaningService Shoe clean(Shoe dirtyShoe) throws OutOfShoePolishException;
ShoeRestoreService Shoe restore(Shoe oldShoe) throws OutOfSparePartsException;

class EnterpriseShoeService {
    // constructor
    ...

    public List<Shoe> processRequest(int numberOfPairs) {
        Try<List<Shoe>> shoes = Try.of(() -> shoeStore.buy(numberOfPairs));
        Try<List<Try<Shoe>>> cleanedAndRestoredShoes = shoes.map(xs -> xs.stream().map(shoe ->
                Try.success(shoe)
                        .andThenTry(shoeCleaningService::clean)
                        .andThenTry(shoeRestoreService::restore))
                .collect(Collectors.toList()));

        List<Shoe> result = cleanedAndRestoredShoes
                .getOrElseGet(err -> {
                    System.out.println(err.getMessage());
                    return Collections.emptyList();
                })
                .stream()
                .map(shoeTry -> shoeTry.onFailure(err -> System.out.println(err.getMessage())))
                .filter(Try::isSuccess)
                .map(Try::get)
                .collect(Collectors.toList());

        return result;

    }
}

My question is: how could this logic be simplified? are there any method calls that could be eliminated? could the readability be improved?

Upvotes: 3

Views: 2755

Answers (1)

Damian0o
Damian0o

Reputation: 653

I do not know if everything is working as expected since no requirements were mention but this should give you an idea of power of decomposition.

import io.vavr.collection.List;
import io.vavr.control.Try;


public class TryListComposition {

   ShoeStore store;

   ShoeCleaningService cleaningService;

   ShoeRestoreService restoreService;

   public java.util.List<Shoe> processRequest(int numberOfPairs) {
    return processShoesRequest(numberOfPairs).getOrElse(List.empty()).toJavaList();
   }

   public Try<List<Shoe>> processShoesRequest(int numberOfPairs) {
      return this.buy(numberOfPairs)
            .map(shoes -> shoes
                    .map(this::cleanAndRestore)
                    .flatMap(x -> x)
            );
   }

   public Try<Shoe> cleanAndRestore(Shoe shoe) {
      return clean(shoe).flatMap(this::restore);
   }


   Try<List<Shoe>> buy(int numberOfPairs) {
      return Try.of(() -> 
        List.ofAll(store.buy(numberOfPairs).stream());
   }

   Try<Shoe> clean(Shoe dirtyShoe) {
      return Try.of(() -> cleaningService.clean(dirtyShoe));
   }

   Try<Shoe> restore(Shoe oldShoe) {
      return Try.of(() -> restoreService.restore(oldShoe));
   }

}

class Shoe {

}

interface ShoeStore {
   java.util.List<Shoe> buy(int numberOfPairs) throws 
   OutOfStockException;
}

interface ShoeCleaningService {
   Shoe clean(Shoe dirtyShoe) throws OutOfShoePolishException;
}

interface ShoeRestoreService {
   Shoe restore(Shoe oldShoe) throws OutOfSparePartsException;
}

class OutOfStockException extends Exception {

}

class OutOfShoePolishException extends Exception {

}

class OutOfSparePartsException extends Exception {

}

Upvotes: 1

Related Questions