Reputation: 37305
What is the shortest, accurate, and cross-browser compatible method for reading a cookie in JavaScript?
Very often, while building stand-alone scripts (where I can't have any outside dependencies), I find myself adding a function for reading cookies, and usually fall-back on the QuirksMode.org readCookie()
method (280 bytes, 216 minified.)
function readCookie(name) {
var nameEQ = name + "=";
var ca = document.cookie.split(';');
for(var i=0;i < ca.length;i++) {
var c = ca[i];
while (c.charAt(0)==' ') c = c.substring(1,c.length);
if (c.indexOf(nameEQ) == 0) return c.substring(nameEQ.length,c.length);
}
return null;
}
It does the job, but its ugly, and adds quite a bit of bloat each time.
The method that jQuery.cookie uses something like this (modified, 165 bytes, 125 minified):
function read_cookie(key)
{
var result;
return (result = new RegExp('(?:^|; )' + encodeURIComponent(key) + '=([^;]*)').exec(document.cookie)) ? (result[1]) : null;
}
Note this is not a 'Code Golf' competition: I'm legitimately interested in reducing the size of my readCookie function, and in ensuring the solution I have is valid.
Upvotes: 267
Views: 302269
Reputation: 29746
On chromium based browsers you can use the experimental cookieStore
api:
await cookieStore.get('cookieName');
Check the Browsersupport before using!
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 4739
Get the cookie value or undefined
if it doesn't exist:
document
.cookie
.split('; ')
.filter(row => row.startsWith('cookie_name='))
.map(c=>c.split('=')[1])[0];
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 1459
It's 2022, everything except Internet Explorer supports the URLSearchParams
API (^1) and String.prototype.replaceAll
API (^2), so we can horribly (ab)use them:
const cookies = new URLSearchParams(document.cookie.replaceAll('&', '%26').replaceAll('; ', '&'));
cookies.get('cookie name'); // returns undefined if not set, string otherwise
Upvotes: 6
Reputation: 3522
Shorter, more reliable and more performant than the current best-voted answer:
const getCookieValue = (name) => (
document.cookie.match('(^|;)\\s*' + name + '\\s*=\\s*([^;]+)')?.pop() || ''
)
A performance comparison of various approaches is shown here:
Some notes on approach:
The regex approach is not only the fastest in most browsers, it yields the shortest function as well. Additionally it should be pointed out that according to the official spec (RFC 2109), the space after the semicolon which separates cookies in the document.cookie is optional and an argument could be made that it should not be relied upon. Additionally, whitespace is allowed before and after the equals sign (=) and an argument could be made that this potential whitespace should be factored into any reliable document.cookie parser. The regex above accounts for both of the above whitespace conditions.
Upvotes: 349
Reputation:
This will only ever hit document.cookie ONE time. Every subsequent request will be instant.
(function(){
var cookies;
function readCookie(name,c,C,i){
if(cookies){ return cookies[name]; }
c = document.cookie.split('; ');
cookies = {};
for(i=c.length-1; i>=0; i--){
C = c[i].split('=');
cookies[C[0]] = C[1];
}
return cookies[name];
}
window.readCookie = readCookie; // or expose it however you want
})();
I'm afraid there really isn't a faster way than this general logic unless you're free to use .forEach
which is browser dependent (even then you're not saving that much)
Your own example slightly compressed to 120 bytes
:
function read_cookie(k,r){return(r=RegExp('(^|; )'+encodeURIComponent(k)+'=([^;]*)').exec(document.cookie))?r[2]:null;}
You can get it to 110 bytes
if you make it a 1-letter function name, 90 bytes
if you drop the encodeURIComponent
.
I've gotten it down to 73 bytes
, but to be fair it's 82 bytes
when named readCookie
and 102 bytes
when then adding encodeURIComponent
:
function C(k){return(document.cookie.match('(^|; )'+k+'=([^;]*)')||0)[2]}
Upvotes: 200
Reputation: 1892
You can verify if a cookie exists and it has a defined value:
function getCookie(cookiename) {
if (typeof(cookiename) == 'string' && cookiename != '') {
const COOKIES = document.cookie.split(';');
for (i = 0; i < COOKIES.length; i++) {
if (COOKIES[i].trim().startsWith(cookiename)) {
return COOKIES[i].split('=')[1];
}
}
}
return null;
}
const COOKIE_EXAMPLE = getCookie('example');
if (COOKIE_EXAMPLE == 'stackoverflow') { ... }
// If is set a cookie named "example" with value "stackoverflow"
if (COOKIE_EXAMPLE != null) { ... }
// If is set a cookie named "example" ignoring the value
It will return null if cookie doesn't exists.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 3
This function doesn't work for older browser like chrome > 80.
const getCookieValue = (name) => (
document.cookie.match('(^|;)\\s*' + name + '\\s*=\\s*([^;]+)')?.pop() || ''
)
I solved it by using this function instead that returns undefined if the cookie is missing:
function getCookie(name) {
// Add the = sign
name = name + '=';
// Get the decoded cookie
var decodedCookie = decodeURIComponent(document.cookie);
// Get all cookies, split on ; sign
var cookies = decodedCookie.split(';');
// Loop over the cookies
for (var i = 0; i < cookies.length; i++) {
// Define the single cookie, and remove whitespace
var cookie = cookies[i].trim();
// If this cookie has the name of what we are searching
if (cookie.indexOf(name) == 0) {
// Return everything after the cookies name
return cookie.substring(name.length, cookie.length);
}
}
}
Credit: https://daily-dev-tips.com/posts/vanilla-javascript-cookies-%F0%9F%8D%AA/
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 20654
The following function will allow differentiating between empty strings and undefined cookies. Undefined cookies will correctly return undefined
and not an empty string unlike some of the other answers here.
function getCookie(name) {
return (document.cookie.match('(^|;) *'+name+'=([^;]*)')||[])[2];
}
The above worked fine for me on all browsers I checked, but as mentioned by @vanovm in comments, as per the specification the key/value may be surrounded by whitespace. Hence the following is more standard compliant.
function getCookie(name) {
return (document.cookie.match('(?:^|;)\\s*'+name.trim()+'\\s*=\\s*([^;]*?)\\s*(?:;|$)')||[])[1];
}
Upvotes: 8
Reputation: 1011
To have all cookies accessible by name in a Map:
const cookies = "a=b ; c = d ;e=";
const map = cookies.split(";").map((s) => s.split("=").map((s) => s.trim())).reduce((m, [k, v]) => (m.set(k, v), m), new Map());
console.log(map); //Map(3) {'a' => 'b', 'c' => 'd', 'e' => ''}
map.get("a"); //returns "b"
map.get("c"); //returns "d"
map.get("e"); //returns ""
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 2759
Just to throw my hat in the race, here's my proposal:
function getCookie(name) {
const cookieDict = document.cookie.split(';')
.map((x)=>x.split('='))
.reduce((accum,current) => { accum[current[0]]=current[1]; return accum;}, Object());
return cookieDict[name];
}
The above code generates a dict that stores cookies as key-value pairs (i.e., cookieDict
), and afterwards accesses the property name
to retrieve the cookie.
This could effectively be expressed as a one-liner, but this is only for the brave:
document.cookie.split(';').map((x)=>x.split('=')).reduce((accum,current) => { accum[current[0]]=current[1]; return accum;}, {})[name]
The absolute best approach would be to generate cookieDict
at page load and then throughout the page lifecycle just access individual cookies by calling cookieDict['cookiename']
.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 33359
To truly remove as much bloat as possible, consider not using a wrapper function at all:
try {
var myCookie = document.cookie.match('(^|;) *myCookie=([^;]*)')[2]
} catch (_) {
// handle missing cookie
}
As long as you're familiar with RegEx, that code is reasonably clean and easy to read.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 417
Here is the simplest solution using javascript string functions.
document.cookie.substring(document.cookie.indexOf("COOKIE_NAME"),
document.cookie.indexOf(";",
document.cookie.indexOf("COOKIE_NAME"))).
substr(COOKIE_NAME.length);
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 2127
Here goes.. Cheers!
function getCookie(n) {
let a = `; ${document.cookie}`.match(`;\\s*${n}=([^;]+)`);
return a ? a[1] : '';
}
Note that I made use of ES6's template strings to compose the regex expression.
Upvotes: 5
Reputation:
this in an object that you can read, write, overWrite and delete cookies.
var cookie = {
write : function (cname, cvalue, exdays) {
var d = new Date();
d.setTime(d.getTime() + (exdays*24*60*60*1000));
var expires = "expires="+d.toUTCString();
document.cookie = cname + "=" + cvalue + "; " + expires;
},
read : function (name) {
if (document.cookie.indexOf(name) > -1) {
return document.cookie.split(name)[1].split("; ")[0].substr(1)
} else {
return "";
}
},
delete : function (cname) {
var d = new Date();
d.setTime(d.getTime() - 1000);
var expires = "expires="+d.toUTCString();
document.cookie = cname + "=; " + expires;
}
};
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 6815
How about this one?
function getCookie(k){var v=document.cookie.match('(^|;) ?'+k+'=([^;]*)(;|$)');return v?v[2]:null}
Counted 89 bytes without the function name.
Upvotes: 10
Reputation: 11936
Based on the question, I believe some assumptions / requirements for this function include:
"foo:bar[0]"
should return a cookie (literally) named "foo:bar[0]";Under these assumptions, it's clear that encodeURIComponent
/ decodeURIComponent
should not be used; doing so assumes that the code that set the cookie also encoded it using these functions.
The regular expression approach gets problematic if the cookie name can contain special characters. jQuery.cookie works around this issue by encoding the cookie name (actually both name and value) when storing a cookie, and decoding the name when retrieving a cookie. A regular expression solution is below.
Unless you're only reading cookies you control completely, it would also be advisable to read cookies from document.cookie
directly and not cache the results, since there is no way to know if the cache is invalid without reading document.cookie
again.
(While accessing and parsing document.cookies
will be slightly slower than using a cache, it would not be as slow as reading other parts of the DOM, since cookies do not play a role in the DOM / render trees.)
Here goes the Code Golf answer, based on PPK's (loop-based) function:
function readCookie(name) {
name += '=';
for (var ca = document.cookie.split(/;\s*/), i = ca.length - 1; i >= 0; i--)
if (!ca[i].indexOf(name))
return ca[i].replace(name, '');
}
which when minified, comes to 128 characters (not counting the function name):
function readCookie(n){n+='=';for(var a=document.cookie.split(/;\s*/),i=a.length-1;i>=0;i--)if(!a[i].indexOf(n))return a[i].replace(n,'');}
Update: If you really want a regular expression solution:
function readCookie(name) {
return (name = new RegExp('(?:^|;\\s*)' + ('' + name).replace(/[-[\]{}()*+?.,\\^$|#\s]/g, '\\$&') + '=([^;]*)').exec(document.cookie)) && name[1];
}
This escapes any special characters in the cookie name before constructing the RegExp object. Minified, this comes to 134 characters (not counting the function name):
function readCookie(n){return(n=new RegExp('(?:^|;\\s*)'+(''+n).replace(/[-[\]{}()*+?.,\\^$|#\s]/g,'\\$&')+'=([^;]*)').exec(document.cookie))&&n[1];}
As Rudu and cwolves have pointed out in the comments, the regular-expression-escaping regex can be shortened by a few characters. I think it would be good to keep the escaping regex consistent (you may be using it elsewhere), but their suggestions are worth considering.
Both of these functions won't handle null
or undefined
, i.e. if there is a cookie named "null", readCookie(null)
will return its value. If you need to handle this case, adapt the code accordingly.
Upvotes: 24
Reputation: 181
code from google analytics ga.js
function c(a){
var d=[],
e=document.cookie.split(";");
a=RegExp("^\\s*"+a+"=\\s*(.*?)\\s*$");
for(var b=0;b<e.length;b++){
var f=e[b].match(a);
f&&d.push(f[1])
}
return d
}
Upvotes: 18
Reputation: 8719
Using cwolves' answer, but not using a closure nor a pre-computed hash :
// Golfed it a bit, too...
function readCookie(n){
var c = document.cookie.split('; '),
i = c.length,
C;
for(; i>0; i--){
C = c[i].split('=');
if(C[0] == n) return C[1];
}
}
...and minifying...
function readCookie(n){var c=document.cookie.split('; '),i=c.length,C;for(;i>0;i--){C=c[i].split('=');if(C[0]==n)return C[1];}}
...equals 127 bytes.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 141
Both of these functions look equally valid in terms of reading cookie. You can shave a few bytes off though (and it really is getting into Code Golf territory here):
function readCookie(name) {
var nameEQ = name + "=", ca = document.cookie.split(';'), i = 0, c;
for(;i < ca.length;i++) {
c = ca[i];
while (c[0]==' ') c = c.substring(1);
if (c.indexOf(nameEQ) == 0) return c.substring(nameEQ.length);
}
return null;
}
All I did with this is collapse all the variable declarations into one var statement, removed the unnecessary second arguments in calls to substring, and replace the one charAt call into an array dereference.
This still isn't as short as the second function you provided, but even that can have a few bytes taken off:
function read_cookie(key)
{
var result;
return (result = new RegExp('(^|; )' + encodeURIComponent(key) + '=([^;]*)').exec(document.cookie)) ? result[2] : null;
}
I changed the first sub-expression in the regular expression to be a capturing sub-expression, and changed the result[1] part to result[2] to coincide with this change; also removed the unnecessary parens around result[2].
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 2897
(edit: posted the wrong version first.. and a non-functional one at that. Updated to current, which uses an unparam function that is much like the second example.)
Nice idea in the first example cwolves. I built on both for a fairly compact cookie reading/writing function that works across multiple subdomains. Figured I'd share in case anyone else runs across this thread looking for that.
(function(s){
s.strToObj = function (x,splitter) {
for ( var y = {},p,a = x.split (splitter),L = a.length;L;) {
p = a[ --L].split ('=');
y[p[0]] = p[1]
}
return y
};
s.rwCookie = function (n,v,e) {
var d=document,
c= s.cookies||s.strToObj(d.cookie,'; '),
h=location.hostname,
domain;
if(v){
domain = h.slice(h.lastIndexOf('.',(h.lastIndexOf('.')-1))+1);
d.cookie = n + '=' + (c[n]=v) + (e ? '; expires=' + e : '') + '; domain=.' + domain + '; path=/'
}
return c[n]||c
};
})(some_global_namespace)
Upvotes: 0