Reputation: 3160
I have a recollection that purrr::pmap_*
can treat a data.frame
as a list but the syntax eludes me.
Imagine we wanted to fit a separate lm
object for each value of mtcars$vs
and mtcars$am
library(tidyverse)
library(broom)
d1 <- mtcars %>%
group_by(
vs, am
) %>%
nest %>%
mutate(
coef = data %>%
map(
~lm(mpg ~ wt, data =.) %>%
tidy
)
)
If I wanted to extract the coefficient estimates as an un-nested data.frame
, and append the values of am
and vs
, I might try
d1[, -3] %>%
pmap_dfr(
function(i, j, k)
k %>%
mutate(
vs = i,
am = j
)
)
But this results in an error. More explicitly declaring these variables as separate lists has the desired effect
list(
d1$vs,
d1$am,
d1$coef
) %>%
pmap_dfr(
function(i, j, k)
k %>%
mutate(
vs = i,
am = j
)
)
Is there a succinct way for pmap_*
to treat a data.frame
as a list?
Upvotes: 1
Views: 56
Reputation: 28705
This is because the second list has no names attribute. If you unname
d1
it works. The fact that you used the list
function in the second example doesn't make a difference (except that it removed the names), because both objects are lists (data frames are lists).
d1[, -3] %>%
unname %>%
pmap_dfr(
function(i, j, k)
k %>%
mutate(
vs = i,
am = j
)
)
# # A tibble: 8 x 7
# term estimate std.error statistic p.value vs am
# <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
# 1 (Intercept) 42.4 3.30 12.8 0.000213 0 1
# 2 wt -7.91 1.14 -6.93 0.00227 0 1
# 3 (Intercept) 44.1 6.96 6.34 0.00144 1 1
# 4 wt -7.77 3.36 -2.31 0.0689 1 1
# 5 (Intercept) 31.5 8.98 3.51 0.0171 1 0
# 6 wt -3.38 2.80 -1.21 0.281 1 0
# 7 (Intercept) 25.1 3.51 7.14 0.0000315 0 0
# 8 wt -2.44 0.842 -2.90 0.0159 0 0
You can also name the arguments in your first code block's function to match (or use ..1
etc) for the same result
d1[, -3] %>%
pmap_dfr(
function(vs, am, coef)
coef %>%
mutate(
vs = vs,
am = am
)
)
# # A tibble: 8 x 7
# term estimate std.error statistic p.value vs am
# <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
# 1 (Intercept) 42.4 3.30 12.8 0.000213 0 1
# 2 wt -7.91 1.14 -6.93 0.00227 0 1
# 3 (Intercept) 44.1 6.96 6.34 0.00144 1 1
# 4 wt -7.77 3.36 -2.31 0.0689 1 1
# 5 (Intercept) 31.5 8.98 3.51 0.0171 1 0
# 6 wt -3.38 2.80 -1.21 0.281 1 0
# 7 (Intercept) 25.1 3.51 7.14 0.0000315 0 0
# 8 wt -2.44 0.842 -2.90 0.0159 0 0
You could also use wap
from the experimental rap package
library(rap)
d1[, -3] %>%
wap( ~ coef %>%
mutate(
vs = vs,
am = am)) %>%
bind_rows
# # A tibble: 8 x 7
# term estimate std.error statistic p.value vs am
# <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
# 1 (Intercept) 42.4 3.30 12.8 0.000213 0 1
# 2 wt -7.91 1.14 -6.93 0.00227 0 1
# 3 (Intercept) 44.1 6.96 6.34 0.00144 1 1
# 4 wt -7.77 3.36 -2.31 0.0689 1 1
# 5 (Intercept) 31.5 8.98 3.51 0.0171 1 0
# 6 wt -3.38 2.80 -1.21 0.281 1 0
# 7 (Intercept) 25.1 3.51 7.14 0.0000315 0 0
# 8 wt -2.44 0.842 -2.90 0.0159 0 0
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 887571
We can use the standard option to extract the components (..1
, ..2
, etc)
d1[, -3] %>%
pmap_dfr(~ ..3 %>%
mutate(vs = ..1, am = ..2))
# A tibble: 8 x 7
# term estimate std.error statistic p.value vs am
# <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#1 (Intercept) 42.4 3.30 12.8 0.000213 0 1
#2 wt -7.91 1.14 -6.93 0.00227 0 1
#3 (Intercept) 44.1 6.96 6.34 0.00144 1 1
#4 wt -7.77 3.36 -2.31 0.0689 1 1
#5 (Intercept) 31.5 8.98 3.51 0.0171 1 0
#6 wt -3.38 2.80 -1.21 0.281 1 0
#7 (Intercept) 25.1 3.51 7.14 0.0000315 0 0
#8 wt -2.44 0.842 -2.90 0.0159 0 0
Upvotes: 3