Reputation: 127
If we declare a variable and a function with same name, it is accepting re-declaration. But when we do the same thing inside a block, it shows re-declaration error.
Code:
var x;
function x() {}; // no error.
But in this case i'm getting Error.
{
var inside; // re-declaration error.
function inside() {};
}
expected result should be no error.
Upvotes: 6
Views: 797
Reputation: 29003
This is an EcmaScript 6 change. From ES6 onwards it's no longer allowed to have duplicate bindings within a block scope.
The ES5 spec does not have such a restriction but in the ES6 spec the semantics have been changed:
13.2.1 Static Semantics: Early Errors
Block : { StatementList }
It is a Syntax Error if the LexicallyDeclaredNames of StatementList contains any duplicate entries.
It is a Syntax Error if any element of the LexicallyDeclaredNames of StatementList also occurs in the VarDeclaredNames of StatementList.
The first part is relevant - LexicallyDeclaredNames
contains all declarations found within the code inside the block.
Presumably, this is part of a change in semantics function declarations in ES6, since now they can be block scoped:
{ //block 1
function foo() { // declared in block 1
return 1;
}
console.log("block 1: foo() === 1", foo() === 1);
{ // block 2
function foo() { // declared in block 2
return 2;
}
console.log("block 2: foo() === 2", foo() === 2);
}
console.log("block 1: foo() === 1", foo() === 1);
}
This is a syntactic sugar over this equivalent ES5 code:
(function() { //block 1
var foo = function() {
return 1;
}
console.log("block 1: foo() === 1", foo() === 1);
(function() { //block 2
var foo = function() {
return 2;
}
console.log("block 2: foo() === 2", foo() === 2);
})();
console.log("block 1: foo() === 1", foo() === 1);
})();
However, this feature cannot work with duplicate names.
The same behaviour persists for any block, including other types of block statements. Here is an example:
{ //block
function foo() { return 1; }
console.log("block: foo() === 1", foo() === 1);
if (true) { // if block
function foo() { return 2; }
console.log("if block: foo() === 2", foo() === 2);
}
for (var i = 0; i < 1; i++) { // for block
function foo() { return 3; }
console.log("for block: foo() === 3", foo() === 3);
}
switch ("hello world") { // case block
default:
function foo() { return 4; }
console.log("case block: foo() === 4", foo() === 4);
}
console.log("block: foo() === 1", foo() === 1);
}
However, it should be noted that duplicate declaration of the same type (var
or function
) do not lead to an error:
{
var foo = 1;
var foo = 2;
console.log("foo ->", foo);
}
{
function bar() { return "a"; }
function bar() { return "b"; }
console.log("bar() ->", bar());
}
So, it seems like they aren't treated as different declarations but overwriting the same lexically declared name.
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 840
While exploring this further I came across this: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/SyntaxError
The funny thing is that my result is different than theirs for this situation:
try{
eval(`{
var x;
function x(){};
}`);
}catch(e){
console.log(e instanceof SyntaxError);
console.log(e.message); // "Hello"
console.log(e.name); // "SyntaxError"
console.log(e.fileName); // "someFile.js"
console.log(e.lineNumber); // 10
console.log(e.columnNumber); // 0
console.log(e.stack); // "@Scratchpad/2:11:9\n"
}
Result:
true // instanceof SyntaxError
06:01:10.526 VM3194:22 Identifier 'x' has already been declared // e.message
06:01:10.527 VM3194:23 SyntaxError // e.name
06:01:10.527 VM3194:24 undefined // e.filename
06:01:10.527 VM3194:25 undefined // e.lineNumber
06:01:10.527 VM3194:26 undefined // e.columnNumber
06:01:10.527 VM3194:27 SyntaxError: Identifier 'x' has already been declared at VM3194:16 // e.stack
Upvotes: 0