Reputation: 5923
I'm currently converting a Delphi method used for random binary file access into Java. The Delphi procedure uses:
TSingleArray = Array[0..MAXSIZE] of Single
...
procedure GetLinkValues(const LinkVar: Integer; const TimePeriod: Integer; var Value: PSingleArray);
...
BlockRead(Fout, Value^, Nlinks*SizeOf(Single));
To read an array of bytes into an array of Single. Is there an equivalent way of doing this in Java without iterating through the array?
I’m currently using
List<Float> l = new ArrayList<Float>();
…
for (int i = 0 ; i < nLinks ; i++ )
l.add( resultsFile.readFloat());
But I’m concerned about speed. Endianness is not a problem.
Upvotes: 5
Views: 4120
Reputation: 5923
Based on the help provided by Jon the final code looks like this:
byte[] bt = new byte[nLinks * 4];
List<Float> l = new ArrayList<Float>();
if (linkVar != 0 && timePeriod < nPeriods) {
long p1 = RECORDSIZE * (nNodes * NODEVARS + nLinks * LINKVARS);
long p2 = RECORDSIZE * (nNodes * NODEVARS + nLinks * (linkVar - 1));
long p3 = offset2 + (timePeriod * p1) + p2;
resultsFile.seek(p3);
resultsFile.read(bt, 0, nLinks * 4);
ByteBuffer bb = ByteBuffer.wrap(bt);
bb.rewind();
bb.asFloatBuffer().get(values);
}
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 7801
There will always be a loop somewhere - whether it is your own, or internally inside a buffer copy method/operation. The only way of speeding things up beyond that is to find hardware and a compiler that supports vector operations.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 1500675
Have you profiled the code and actually found it to be a problem? Something is going to have to loop... are you really sure this is a bottleneck in your code?
Having said all that, you should be able to use a FloatBuffer which I suspect does what you want. Unfortunately Sun's JavaDoc is down, so I can't easily link to or check the documentation at the minute.
To use a FloatBuffer, you'd probably want to:
I'm not particularly familiar/comfortable with java.nio, so I hope this is all correct - but it's likely to be pretty fiddly. Your current loop is almost certainly simpler, so I strongly suggest you check the performance of that first! You might want to wrap your current FileInputStream in a BufferedInputStream, btw.
Upvotes: 8