Reputation: 1460
I am writing my own trim() in C. There is a structure which contains all string values, the structure is getting populated from the data coming from a file which contains spaces before and after the beginning of a word.
char *trim(char *string)
{
int stPos,endPos;
int len=strlen(string);
for(stPos=0;stPos<len && string[stPos]==' ';++stPos);
for(endPos=len-1;endPos>=0 && string[endPos]==' ';--endPos);
char *trimmedStr = (char*)malloc(len*sizeof(char));
strncpy(trimmedStr,string+stPos,endPos+1);
return trimmedStr;
}
int main()
{
char string1[]=" a sdf ie ";
char *string =trim(string1);
printf("%s",string);
return 0;
}
Above code is working fine, but i don't want to declare new variable that stores the trimmed word. As the structure contains around 100 variables.
Is there any way to do somthing like below where I dont need any second variable to print the trimmed string.
printf("%s",trim(string1));
I believe above print can create dangling pointer situation.
Also, is there any way where I don't have to charge original string as well, like if I print trim(string) it will print trimmed string and when i print only string, it will print original string
Upvotes: 0
Views: 4031
Reputation: 96
elcuco was faster. but it's done so here we go:
char *trim(char *string)
{
char *ptr = NULL;
while (*string == ' ') string++; // chomp away space at the start
ptr = string + strlen(string) - 1; // jump to the last char (-1 because '\0')
while (*ptr == ' '){ *ptr = '\0' ; ptr--; } ; // overwrite with end of string
return string; // return pointer to the modified start
}
If you don't want to alter the original string I'd write a special print instead:
void trim_print(char *string)
{
char *ptr = NULL;
while (*string == ' ') string++; // chomp away space at the start
ptr = string + strlen(string) - 1; // jump to the last char (-1 because '\0')
while (*ptr == ' '){ ptr--; } ; // find end of string
while (string <= ptr) { putchar(*string++); } // you get the picture
}
something like that.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 84521
If you don't want to change the original, then you will need to make a copy, or pass a second array of sufficient size as a parameter to your function for filling. Otherwise a simple in-place trmming is fine -- so long as the original string is mutable.
An easy way to approach trimming on leading and trailing whitespace is to determine the number of leading whitespace characters to remove. Then simply use memmove
to move from the first non-whitespace character back to the beginning of the string (don't forget to move the nul-character with the right portion of the string).
That leaves only removing trailing whitespace. An easy approach there is to loop from the end of the string toward the beginning, overwriting each character of trailing whitespace with a nul-character until your first non-whitespace character denoting the new end of string is found.
A simple implementation for that could be:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <ctype.h>
#define DELIM " \t\n" /* whitespace constant delimiters for strspn */
/** trim leading and trailing whitespace from s, (s must be mutable) */
char *trim (char *s)
{
size_t beg = strspn (s, DELIM), /* no of chars of leading whitespace */
len = strlen (s); /* length of s */
if (beg == len) { /* string is all whitespace */
*s = 0; /* make s the empty-string */
return s;
}
memmove (s, s + beg, len - beg + 1); /* shift string to beginning */
for (int i = (int)(len - beg - 1); i >= 0; i--) { /* loop from end */
if (isspace(s[i])) /* checking if char is whitespace */
s[i] = 0; /* overwrite with nul-character */
else
break; /* otherwise - done */
}
return s; /* Return s */
}
int main (void) {
char string1[] = " a sdf ie ";
printf ("original: '%s'\n", string1);
printf ("trimmed : '%s'\n", trim(string1));
}
(note: additional intervening whitespace was added to your initial string to show that multiple intervening whitespace is left unchanged, the output is single-quoted to show the remaining text boundaries)
Example Use/Output
$ ./bin/strtrim
original: ' a sdf ie '
trimmed : 'a sdf ie'
Look things over and let me know if you have further questions.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 12732
Also, is there any way where I don't have to charge original string as well, like if I print trim(string) it will print trimmed string and when i print only string, it will print original string
Yes you can, but you cannot allocate new memory in the trim
function as you will not be holding the return memory.
You can have a static char buffer in the trim
function and operate on it.
Updated version of @elcuco answer.
#include <stdio.h>
char *trim(char *string)
{
static char buff[some max length];
// trim prefix
while ((*string) == ' ' ) {
string++;
}
// find end of original string
int i = 0;
while (*string) {
buff[i++] = *string;
string++;
}
// trim suffix
while ((buff[i]) == ' ' ) {
buff[i] = '\0';
i--;
}
return buff;
}
int main()
{
char string1[] = " abcdefg abcdf ";
char *string = trim(string1);
printf("String is [%s]\n",string);
return 0;
}
With this you don't need to worry about holding reference to trim
function return.
Note: Previous values of
buff
will be overwritten with new call totrim
function.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 164639
...is there any way where i don't have to charge original string as well, like if i do trim(string) it will print trimmed string and when i print only string, it will print original string – avinashse 8 mins ago
Yes, though it gets silly.
You could modify the original string.
trim(string);
printf("trimmed: %s\n", string);
The advantage is you have the option of duplicating the string if you want to retain the original.
char *original = strdup(string);
trim(string);
printf("trimmed: %s\n", string);
If you don't want to modify the original string, that means you need to allocate memory for the modified string. That memory then must be freed. That means a new variable to hold the pointer so you can free it.
char *trimmed = trim(original);
printf("trimmed: %s\n", trimmed);
free(trimmed);
You can get around this by passing a function pointer into trim
and having trim
manage all the memory for you.
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
void trim(char *string, void(*func)(char *) )
{
// Advance the pointer to the first non-space char
while( *string == ' ' ) {
string++;
}
// Shrink the length to the last non-space char.
size_t len = strlen(string);
while(string[len-1]==' ') {
len--;
}
// Copy the string to stack memory
char trimmedStr[len + 1];
strncpy(trimmedStr,string, len);
// strncpy does not add a null byte, add it ourselves.
trimmedStr[len] = '\0';
// pass the trimmed string into the user function.
func(trimmedStr);
}
void print_string(char *str) {
printf("'%s'\n", str);
}
int main()
{
char string[]=" a sdf ie ";
trim(string, print_string);
printf("original: '%s'\n", string);
return 0;
}
Ta da! One variable, the original is left unmodified, no memory leaks.
While function pointers have their uses, this is a bit silly.
It's C. Get used to managing memory. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 8614
You can modify the function by giving the output in the same input string
void trim(char *string)
{
int i;
int stPos,endPos;
int len=strlen(string);
for(stPos=0;stPos<len && string[stPos]==' ';++stPos);
for(endPos=len-1;endPos>=0 && string[endPos]==' ';--endPos);
for (i=0; i<=(endPos-stPos); i++)
{
string[i] = string[i+stPos];
}
string[i] = '\0'; // terminate the string and discard the remaining spaces.
}
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 9208
You could the original string in order to do this. For trimming the prefix I just advance the pointer, and for the suffix, I actually add \0
. If you want to keep the original starting as is, you will have to move memory (which makes this an O(n^2) time complexity solution, from an O(n) I provided).
#include <stdio.h>
char *trim(char *string)
{
// trim prefix
while ((*string) == ' ' ) {
string ++;
}
// find end of original string
char *c = string;
while (*c) {
c ++;
}
c--;
// trim suffix
while ((*c) == ' ' ) {
*c = '\0';
c--;
}
return string;
}
int main()
{
char string1[] = " abcdefg abcdf ";
char *string = trim(string1);
printf("String is [%s]\n",string);
return 0;
}
(re-thinking... is it really O(n^2)? Or is it O(2n) which is a higher O(n)...? I guess depending on implementation)
Upvotes: 0