user1955934
user1955934

Reputation: 3495

WebFlux Conditional FlatMap

I'm relatively new to webflux and i want to find solution to avoid nested flatMap when there are conditionals:

I have 3 simple entities:

Item, Brand, Category.

Item basically contains: brandId and categoryId

public Mono<Item> patch(String itemId, PatchSpecs specs) {
return itemRepository.findById(itemId)
        .switchIfEmpty(Mono.error(..)))
        .flatMap(item -> {
            final String brandId = specs.getBrandId();
            if (brandId != null) {
                return brandService.getById(brandId)
                        .switchIfEmpty(Mono.error(..)))
                        .flatMap(brand -> {
                            final String categoryId = specs.getCategoryId();
                            if (categoryId != null) {
                               return categoryService.getById(categoryId)... -> return updateAndSave(..)
                            }
                            return updateAndSave(specs, item, brand, null);
                        });
            }
            else {
                final String categoryId = specs.getCategoryId();
                if (categoryId != null) {
                     return categoryService.getById(categoryId)... -> return updateAndSave(..)
                }
                return updateAndSave(specs, item, null, null);
            }

        });
}

How do I prevent this branching conditional flatMaps mess? I cannot imagine if i have another entity inside Item. There will be more nested flatMaps?

Upvotes: 3

Views: 7259

Answers (1)

Martin Tarj&#225;nyi
Martin Tarj&#225;nyi

Reputation: 9937

If I understand your code well category and brand are optional attributes of the item. In this case I'd recommend the following:

public Mono<Item> patch(String itemId, PatchSpecs specs)
{
    return itemRepository.findById(itemId)
                         .switchIfEmpty(Mono.error(new RuntimeException("Can not find item.")))
                         .flatMap(item -> updateAndSave(specs, item));
}

private Mono<? extends Item> updateAndSave(PatchSpecs specs, Item item)
{
    Mono<Optional<Brand>> brand = getBrand(specs.getBrandId());
    Mono<Optional<Category>> category = getCategory(specs.getCategoryId());

    return Mono.zip(Mono.just(item), brand, category)
               .flatMap(tuple -> updateAndSave(specs, tuple));
}

private Mono<Optional<Brand>> getBrand(String inputBrandId)
{
    return Mono.justOrEmpty(inputBrandId)
               .flatMap(brandId -> brandService.getById(brandId)
                                               .switchIfEmpty(Mono.error(new RuntimeException("Can not find brand."))))
               .map(Optional::of)
               .defaultIfEmpty(Optional.empty());
}

private Mono<Optional<Category>> getCategory(String inputCategoryId)
{
    return Mono.justOrEmpty(inputCategoryId)
               .flatMap(brandId -> categoryService.getById(brandId)
                                                  .switchIfEmpty(Mono.error(new RuntimeException("Can not find brand."))))
               .map(Optional::of)
               .defaultIfEmpty(Optional.empty());
}

private Mono<Item> updateAndSave(PatchSpecs specs, Tuple3<Item, Optional<Brand>, Optional<Category>> tuple)
{
    Item item = tuple.getT1();
    Brand brand = tuple.getT2().orElse(null);
    Category category = tuple.getT3().orElse(null);

    // TODO do update and save here
    return null;
}

It will be more extensible this way and no need for duplication and nested conditionals. Please, verify it works as you expect.

Upvotes: 5

Related Questions