Reputation: 33581
I am reverse engineering a previous employee's work and noticed a number of css classes look like this...
.img-shadow {
float:left;
background: url(../images/shadowAlpha.png) no-repeat bottom right !important;
background: url(../images/shadow.gif) no-repeat bottom right;
}
Can anybody think of a reason for a css class to declare background twice like this (specifically with the !important)?
Upvotes: 0
Views: 355
Reputation: 50185
It's a cheap PNG fix for IE6. Since IE6 won't recognize the !important
tag, it will use the GIF background, while all other browsers will use the PNG.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 20730
According to wikipedia, the second background
rule is for IE6.
Internet Explorer 6 and below also have a problem with !important declarations when the same property of the same element has another value specified within the same code block, without another !important declaration. This should result in the second value being overridden by the first, but IE6 and lower do not honor this.
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 27405
looks like he's attempting to support browsers that don't handle alpha .png's properly (cough IE6 cough)
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 15134
Older versions of IE will use the last one.
These versions had problems with png transparency.
Upvotes: 0