Reputation: 57998
I am trying to insert a chunk of HTML into a div. I want to see if plain JavaScript way is faster than using jQuery. Unfortunately, I forgot how to do it the 'old' way. :P
var test2 = function(){
var cb = function(html){
var t1 = document.getElementById("test2");
var d = document.createElement("div");
d.id ="oiio";
d.innerHtml = html;
t1.appendChild(d);
console.timeEnd("load data with javascript");
};
console.time("load data with javascript");
$.get("test1.html", cb);
}
what am i doing wrong here guys?
edit:
Someone asked which is faster, jquery or plain js so i wrote up a test:
https://jsben.ch/FBQYM
plain js is 10% faster
Upvotes: 163
Views: 713275
Reputation: 899
document.getElementById('tag-id').insertAdjacentHTML("beforebegin",'<ol><li>html data</li></ol>')
'beforebegin': Before the element itself
'afterbegin': Just inside the element, before its first child
'beforeend': Just inside the element, after its last child
'afterend': After the element itself
More details : developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Element/insertAdjacentHTML
Upvotes: 26
Reputation: 12314
I think this is what you want:
document.getElementById('tag-id').innerHTML = '<ol><li>html data</li></ol>';
Keep in mind that innerHTML is not accessible for all types of tags when using IE. (table elements for example)
Upvotes: 242
Reputation: 92743
As alternative you can use insertAdjacentHTML - however I dig into and make some performance tests - (2019.09.13 Friday) MacOs High Sierra 10.13.6 on Chrome 76.0.3809 (64-bit), Safari 12.1.2 (13604.5.6), Firefox 69.0.0 (64-bit) ). The test F is only for reference - it is out of the question scope because we need to insert dynamically html - but in F I do it by 'hand' (in static way) - theoretically (as far I know) this should be the fastest way to insert new html elements.
SUMMARY
innerHTML =
(do not confuse with +=
) is fastest (Safari 48k operations per second, Firefox 43k op/sec, Chrome 23k op/sec) The A is ~31% slower than ideal solution F only chrome but on safari and firefox is faster (!)innerHTML +=...
is slowest on all browsers (Chrome 95 op/sec, Firefox 88 op/sec, Sfari 84 op/sec)More info about why innerHTML =
is much faster than innerHTML +=
is here. You can perform test on your machine/browser HERE
let html = "<div class='box'>Hello <span class='msg'>World</span> !!!</div>"
function A() {
container.innerHTML = `<div id="A_oiio">A: ${html}</div>`;
}
function B() {
container.innerHTML += `<div id="B_oiio">B: ${html}</div>`;
}
function C() {
container.insertAdjacentHTML('beforeend', `<div id="C_oiio">C: ${html}</div>`);
}
function D() {
$('#container').append(`<div id="D_oiio">D: ${html}</div>`);
}
function E() {
let d = document.createElement("div");
d.innerHTML = `E: ${html}`;
d.id = 'E_oiio';
container.appendChild(d);
}
function F() {
let dm = document.createElement("div");
dm.id = "F_oiio";
dm.appendChild(document.createTextNode("F: "));
let d = document.createElement("div");
d.classList.add('box');
d.appendChild(document.createTextNode("Hello "));
let s = document.createElement("span");
s.classList.add('msg');
s.appendChild(document.createTextNode("World"));
d.appendChild(s);
d.appendChild(document.createTextNode(" !!!"));
dm.appendChild( d );
container.appendChild(dm);
}
A();
B();
C();
D();
E();
F();
.warr { color: red } .msg { color: blue } .box {display: inline}
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div class="warr">This snippet only for show code used in test (in jsperf.com) - it not perform test itself. </div>
<div id="container"></div>
Upvotes: 37
Reputation: 722
And many lines may look like this. The html here is sample only.
var div = document.createElement("div");
div.innerHTML =
'<div class="slideshow-container">\n' +
'<div class="mySlides fade">\n' +
'<div class="numbertext">1 / 3</div>\n' +
'<img src="image1.jpg" style="width:100%">\n' +
'<div class="text">Caption Text</div>\n' +
'</div>\n' +
'<div class="mySlides fade">\n' +
'<div class="numbertext">2 / 3</div>\n' +
'<img src="image2.jpg" style="width:100%">\n' +
'<div class="text">Caption Two</div>\n' +
'</div>\n' +
'<div class="mySlides fade">\n' +
'<div class="numbertext">3 / 3</div>\n' +
'<img src="image3.jpg" style="width:100%">\n' +
'<div class="text">Caption Three</div>\n' +
'</div>\n' +
'<a class="prev" onclick="plusSlides(-1)">❮</a>\n' +
'<a class="next" onclick="plusSlides(1)">❯</a>\n' +
'</div>\n' +
'<br>\n' +
'<div style="text-align:center">\n' +
'<span class="dot" onclick="currentSlide(1)"></span> \n' +
'<span class="dot" onclick="currentSlide(2)"></span> \n' +
'<span class="dot" onclick="currentSlide(3)"></span> \n' +
'</div>\n';
document.body.appendChild(div);
Upvotes: 19
Reputation: 767
I using "+" (plus) to insert div to html :
document.getElementById('idParent').innerHTML += '<div id="idChild"> content html </div>';
Hope this help.
Upvotes: 52
Reputation: 813
Using JQuery would take care of that browser inconsistency. With the jquery library included in your project simply write:
$('#yourDivName').html('yourtHTML');
You may also consider using:
$('#yourDivName').append('yourtHTML');
This will add your gallery as the last item in the selected div. Or:
$('#yourDivName').prepend('yourtHTML');
This will add it as the first item in the selected div.
See the JQuery docs for these functions:
Upvotes: 57