Reputation: 7273
Here is the I am trying:
import struct
#binary_data = open("your_binary_file.bin","rb").read()
#your binary data would show up as a big string like this one when you .read()
binary_data = '\x44\x69\x62\x65\x6e\x7a\x6f\x79\x6c\x70\x65\x72\x6f\x78\x69\x64\x20\x31\
x32\x30\x20\x43\x20\x30\x33\x2e\x30\x35\x2e\x31\x39\x39\x34\x20\x31\x34\x3a\x32\
x34\x3a\x33\x30'
def search(text):
#convert the text to binary first
s = ""
for c in text:
s+=struct.pack("b", ord(c))
results = binary_data.find(s)
if results == -1:
print ("no results found")
else:
print ("the string [%s] is found at position %s in the binary data"%(text, results))
search("Dibenzoylperoxid")
search("03.05.1994")
And this is the error I am getting:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "dec_new.py", line 22, in <module>
search("Dibenzoylperoxid")
File "dec_new.py", line 14, in search
s+=struct.pack("b", ord(c))
TypeError: Can't convert 'bytes' object to str implicitly
Kindly, let me know what I can do to make it functional properly.
I am using Python 3.5.0.
Upvotes: 0
Views: 29
Reputation: 76264
s = ""
for c in text:
s+=struct.pack("b", ord(c))
This won't work because s
is a string, and struct.pack
returns a bytes, and you can't add a string and a bytes.
One possible solution is to make s
a bytes.
s = b""
... But it seems like a lot of work to convert a string to a bytes this way. Why not just use encode()
?
def search(text):
#convert the text to binary first
s = text.encode()
results = binary_data.find(s)
#etc
Also, "your binary data would show up as a big string like this one when you .read()" is not, strictly speaking, true. The binary data won't show up as a big string, because it is a bytes, not a string. If you want to create a bytes literal that resembles what might be returned by open("your_binary_file.bin","rb").read()
, use the bytes literal syntax binary_data = b'\x44\x69<...etc...>\x33\x30'
Upvotes: 2