CODEWITHSUNDEEP
pythonpython-3.xtensorflowkerasneural-network
Albert
Albert

Reputation: 399

Custom loss function that updates at each step via gradient descent

From this post, we can write a custom loss function. Now, assume that the custom loss function depends on parameter a:

def customLoss(yTrue,yPred):
    return (K.log(yTrue) - K.log(yPred))**2+a*yPred

How can we update parameter a at each step in a gradient descent manner like the weights?:

a_new= a_old - alpha * (derivative of custom loss with respect to a)

P.S. the real custom loss is different from the above. Please give me a general answer that works for any arbitrary custom loss function, not an answer to the example above.

Upvotes: 3

Views: 1084

Answers (1)

Daniel Möller
Daniel Möller

Reputation: 86610

Create a custom layer to hold the trainable parameter. This layer will not return the inputs in its call, but we are going to have the inputs for complying with how you create layers.

class TrainableLossLayer(Layer):

    def __init__(self, a_initializer, **kwargs):
        super(TrainableLossLayer, self).__init__(**kwargs)
        self.a_initializer = keras.initializers.get(a_initializer)

    #method where weights are defined
    def build(self, input_shape):
        self.kernel = self.add_weight(name='kernel_a', 
                                  shape=(1,),
                                  initializer=self.a_initializer,
                                  trainable=True)
        self.built=True

    #method to define the layers operation (only return the weights)
    def call(self, inputs):
        return self.kernel

    #output shape
    def compute_output_shape(self, input_shape):
        return (1,)

Use the layer in your model to get a with any inputs (this is not compatible with a Sequential model):

a = TrainableLossLayer(a_init, name="somename")(anyInput)

Now, you can try to define your loss in a sort of ugly way:

def customLoss(yTrue,yPred):
    return (K.log(yTrue) - K.log(yPred))**2+a*yPred

If this works, then it's ready.

You can also try a more complicated model (if you don't want to use a in the loss jumping over the layers like that, this might cause problems in model saving/loading)

In this case, you will need that y_train goes in as an input instead of an output:

y_true_inputs = Input(...)

Your loss function will go into a Lambda layer taking all parameters properly:

def lambdaLoss(x):
    yTrue, yPred, alpha = x
    return (K.log(yTrue) - K.log(yPred))**2+alpha*yPred

loss = Lambda(lambdaLoss)([y_true_inputs, original_model_outputs, a])

Your model will output this loss:

model = Model([original_model_inputs, y_true_inputs], loss)

You will have a dummy loss function:

def dummyLoss(true, pred):
    return pred

model.compile(loss = dummyLoss, ...)

And train as:

model.fit([x_train, y_train], anything_maybe_None_or_np_zeros ,....)

Upvotes: 3

Related Questions