Reputation: 345
There is a isCase field in POJO that gets mapped to case and is_case at the same time(which is not what expected). Removing @JsonProperty annotation gets rid of is_case field in json, but is_case is what it's supposed to be. Putting @JsonIgnore on isCase doesn't get rid of case in response json. Renaming isCase to is_case does get rid of case in response json, but that doesn't seem too right. Why would Jackson ever map single java field to two fields? A POJO is declared like this:
public class CreateRuleResponse {
@JsonProperty(value = "rule_name", required = true)
private String name;
@JsonProperty("rule_num")
private String ruleNum;
@JsonProperty(value = "rule_category")
private RuleCategory ruleCategory;
@JsonProperty(value = "rule_status")
private RuleStatus ruleStatus;
@JsonProperty(value = "rule_channel_type")
private String ruleChannelType;
@JsonProperty("action")
private RuleAction ruleAction;
@JsonProperty("is_case")
private Boolean isCase;
public CreateRuleResponse() {
}
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
public String getRuleNum() {
return ruleNum;
}
public void setRuleNum(String ruleNum) {
this.ruleNum = ruleNum;
}
public RuleCategory getRuleCategory() {
return ruleCategory;
}
public void setRuleCategory(RuleCategory ruleCategory) {
this.ruleCategory = ruleCategory;
}
public RuleStatus getRuleStatus() {
return ruleStatus;
}
public void setRuleStatus(RuleStatus ruleStatus) {
this.ruleStatus = ruleStatus;
}
public String getRuleChannelType() {
return ruleChannelType;
}
public void setRuleChannelType(String ruleChannelType) {
this.ruleChannelType = ruleChannelType;
}
public RuleAction getRuleAction() {
return ruleAction;
}
public void setRuleAction(RuleAction ruleAction) {
this.ruleAction = ruleAction;
}
public Boolean getCase() {
return isCase;
}
public void setCase(Boolean aCase) {
isCase = aCase;
}
}
Upvotes: 1
Views: 332
Reputation: 3866
Rename this getter method from getCase()
to getIsCase()
(following the convention). Jackson is treating it as 2 different fields because the getter and the field name do not match.
Upvotes: 1