Reputation: 1954
I would like to get a list of all the forks of a specific repository.
When I try the following on explorer
repository( owner: "someOrg", name: "specificRepo"){
name
forkCount
forks(first: 12){
totalCount
nodes{
name
}
}
}
}
It returns the fork count correctly, but inside nodes, the name is just the original repo name. But I would like it to give the names of all the forked repositories.
{
"data": {
"repository": {
"name": "specificRepo",
"forkCount": 12,
"forks": {
"totalCount": 1,
"nodes": [
{
"name": "specificRepo",
}
]
}
}
}
}
Upvotes: 1
Views: 791
Reputation: 1471
Today you can request to add the nameWithOwner
field as well and even the url
. That will give you the information you need.
{
repository(
owner: "Semantic-Org"
name: "Semantic-Ui"
) {
name
forkCount
forks(
first: 12
orderBy: { field: NAME, direction: DESC }
) {
totalCount
nodes {
name
nameWithOwner
url
}
}
}
}
Which will give you:
{
"data": {
"repository": {
"name": "Semantic-UI",
"forkCount": 5133,
"forks": {
"totalCount": 4919,
"nodes": [
{
"name": "Vanz-Sing-In",
"nameWithOwner": "semantic-apps/Vanz-Sing-In",
"url": "https://github.com/semantic-apps/Vanz-Sing-In"
},
etc.
}
}
}
}
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 84687
If you fork a repo and then change the name, the name
field will reflect the changed name, not the original name. For example, here's a fork of Semantic-UI
:
{
repository(
owner: "Semantic-Org"
name: "Semantic-Ui"
) {
name
forkCount
forks(
first: 12
orderBy: { field: NAME, direction: DESC }
) {
totalCount
nodes {
name
}
}
}
}
{
"data": {
"repository": {
"name": "Semantic-UI",
"forkCount": 4936,
"forks": {
"totalCount": 4743,
"nodes": [
{
"name": "WEB_JS_GUI-Semantic-UI"
},
{
"name": "Vanz-Sing-In"
},
{
"name": "Somewhat-Semantic-UI"
},
{
"name": "semantic_1.0_experiment"
},
{
"name": "semanticui"
},
{
"name": "semantic.ui_main"
},
{
"name": "Semantic-UI-V2"
},
{
"name": "Semantic-UI-tr"
},
{
"name": "Semantic-UI-tr"
},
{
"name": "Semantic-UI-Stylus"
},
{
"name": "Semantic-UI-pt-br"
},
{
"name": "Semantic-UI-pp"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Upvotes: 2