CODEWITHSUNDEEP
assemblyintelx86
ddriver1
ddriver1

Reputation: 733

Returning result to eax (IA-32 Assembly language)

I'm slightly confused as to how to return a value from a method in assembly language. As far as I know, the eax register is used to hold the result that is to be returned.

As an example, say my result is 4 and I use:

mov eax, 4

I now have 4 in eax and I want to return this method. Is there anything I need to do or will the instruction ret automatically return the result?

The thing is that I don't know what's so special about register eax since when I use ret I go back to the caller, and the caller is free to access any of the registers I stored the result to, so why I couldn't just have used ebx or ecx with the result stored instead?

Upvotes: 8

Views: 10047

Answers (2)

Jasper Bekkers
Jasper Bekkers

Reputation: 6809

The reason the result is stored in eax is convention; you can decide to store it in whatever register you like. However, the caller of your function is likely to assume that the content of the return value is stored in eax. This also implies that you don't have to do any extra work when calling ret.

Upvotes: 12

Pontus Gagge
Pontus Gagge

Reputation: 17258

What you are describing is a convention used by at least the Microsoft compilers. There's nothing particular about eax in itself. If your assembly language function is called by C/C++ code compiled with one of the normal calling conventions, it will expect the result to be passed in eax.

ret merely returns control to the point where your function was called. No registers are affected (except for ESP and the instruction pointer, of course).

Upvotes: 5

Related Questions