Reputation: 824
so I have the following code:
public someFunctionName = (someParam: someType): void => {
...some code
};
When I run eslint on the file I get the error: expected someFunctionName to have a type annotation
.
The only way that I can find to solve this is to remove the arrow function and replace with a regular function.
Does anyone know how to fix this problem for arrow functions?
Upvotes: 1
Views: 3248
Reputation: 3392
Type-defining the function signature may help:
type SomeFuncType = (a: number) => void;
const someFunc: SomeFuncType = (a: number): void => {
//
};
Also helps when exporting callback types.
I've recently dropped all uses of tslint, and adopted typescript-eslint instead. This includes removal of the VS Code tslint extension. Prettier is pretty much my choice these days.
Upvotes: 2