Reputation: 5
So this is basically my code
abstract class B
{
int x = 3;
B()
{
x+=2;
System.out.print("-x" + x + "\n"); // print -x5
x++; // 5 then 6
}
abstract int calculate();
abstract int calculate(int i);
}
class A extends B
{
int x = 2;
A()
{
System.out.print("-x" + calculate(2)+"\n");
}
@Override
int calculate()
{
return x;
}
@Override
int calculate(int i)
{
return(calculate()+i);
}
}
public class Test2 extends A
{
Test2()
{
x+=3;
}
@Override
int calculate()
{
return x + 6;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Test2 sub = new Test2();
System.out.print("-x" + sub.calculate()+"\n");
}
}
My problem here is after digging up about variable hiding I learned that if a instance variable is of the same name in both parent class and child class then the childclass hides the instance variable of the parent class. Also I have the prior knowledge that variables cannot be overridden when child class inherits parent class.
So now coming to the problem, in the code when A extends to B, why does the print statement inside constructor A() gives a value -x10? shouldn't it be -x8?? I dont understand how the variable is being changed here. I am new to java so any kind of knowledge will be greatly appreciated. :)
Ok so I have done some debugging and found that the calculate(void) method in class A returns 8. But how is that possible shouldn't it return 6? Please help!
Upvotes: 0
Views: 66
Reputation: 6710
It is returning 8 because:
The line you called System.out.print("-x" + sub.calculate()+"\n");
in class A calls
@Override
int calculate()
{
return x + 6;
}
in class A still, which is incrementing the instance variable int x = 2
in class A . this variable overwrote the one in class B
Hence 2+6 = 8
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 6336
The reason it prints -x10 is because A::calculate(2) calls the Test2::calculate(), which uses A::x to do the calculation.
The sequence of calls that happens is the following:
Test2() {
A()
B() {
B::x = 3
B::x += 2
System.out.print("-x" + x + "\n"); // print -x5
B::x++ // B::x is now 6
}
A::x = 2
System.out.print("-x" + calculate(2)+"\n")
A::calculate(2) {
return(calculate()+2);
Test2::calculate() {
return A::x + 6; // A::x is 2 here, so returns 8
}
} // returns calculate()+2, so returns 10
}
A::x += 3
}
I hope this is just code to test things out, because you should never allow this to happen in real code. You should never allow a method of a subclass to be called from the constructor of a base class, because the subclass is not initialised at that time. The Java compiler does its best to prevent that, but sometimes it does not detect it.
Upvotes: 1