Reputation: 154918
I have a setInterval
running a piece of code 30 times a second. This works great, however when I select another tab (so that the tab with my code becomes inactive), the setInterval
is set to an idle state for some reason.
I made this simplified test case (http://jsfiddle.net/7f6DX/3/):
var $div = $('div');
var a = 0;
setInterval(function() {
a++;
$div.css("left", a)
}, 1000 / 30);
If you run this code and then switch to another tab, wait a few seconds and go back, the animation continues at the point it was when you switched to the other tab.
So the animation isn't running 30 times a second in case the tab is inactive. This can be confirmed by counting the amount of times the setInterval
function is called each second - this will not be 30 but just 1 or 2 if the tab is inactive.
I guess that this is done by design so as to improve system performance, but is there any way to disable this behavior?
It’s actually a disadvantage in my scenario.
Upvotes: 281
Views: 234967
Reputation: 5181
Note: This solution is not suitable if you like your interval works in the background, for example, playing audio or something else. But if you are confused for example, about your animation not working properly when coming back to your page or tab, this is a good solution.
There are many ways to achieve this goal; maybe "WebWorkers" is the most standard one but certainly, it's not the easiest and most handy one, especially if you don't have enough time, so you can try this way:
build a name for your interval (or animation) and set your interval (animation), so it would run when the user first opens your page : var interval_id = setInterval(your_func, 3000);
by $(window).focus(function() {});
and $(window).blur(function() {});
you can'' every time browser (tab) is deactivated and ReRun your interval (animation) everytime time browser (tab) would animate again by interval_id = setInterval();
var interval_id = setInterval(your_func, 3000);
$(window).focus(function() {
interval_id = setInterval(your_func, 3000);
});
$(window).blur(function() {
clearInterval(interval_id);
interval_id = 0,
});
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 382
Here is a replacement for setInterval() and setTimeout() which works in inactive tabs: https://www.npmjs.com/package/worker-timers.
For scripts that rely on WindowTimers like setInterval() or setTimeout() things get confusing when the site which the script is running on loses focus. Chrome, Firefox and maybe others throttle the frequency at which they invoke those timers to a maximum of once per second in such a situation.
However this is only true for the main thread and does not affect the behavior of Web Workers. Therefore it is possible to avoid the throttling by using a worker to do the actual scheduling. This is exactly what worker-timers does.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 21384
Inspired by Ruslan's answer, a handy little class you can just copy&paste into your code as a replacement for setInterval
:
class WorkerInterval {
worker = null;
constructor(callback, interval) {
const blob = new Blob([`setInterval(() => postMessage(0), ${interval});`]);
const workerScript = URL.createObjectURL(blob);
this.worker = new Worker(workerScript);
this.worker.onmessage = callback;
}
stop() {
this.worker.terminate();
}
}
Example usage:
const interval = new WorkerInterval(callback, 100);
// sometime later
interval.stop();
Upvotes: 15
Reputation: 48713
I modified Lacerda's response, by adding a functioning UI.
I added start/resume/pause/stop actions.
const
timer = document.querySelector('.timer'),
timerDisplay = timer.querySelector('.timer-display'),
toggleAction = timer.querySelector('[data-action="toggle"]'),
stopAction = timer.querySelector('[data-action="stop"]'),
tickRate = 10;
let intervalId, initialTime, pauseTime = 0;
const now = () => new Date().getTime();
const formatTime = (hours, minutes, seconds) =>
[hours, minutes, seconds]
.map(v => `${isNaN(v) ? 0 : v}`.padStart(2, '0'))
.join(':');
const update = () => {
let
time = (now() - initialTime) + 10,
hours = Math.floor((time / (60000)) % 60),
minutes = Math.floor((time / 1000) % 60),
seconds = Math.floor((time / 10) % 100);
timerDisplay.textContent = formatTime(hours, minutes, seconds);
};
const
startTimer = () => {
initialTime = now();
intervalId = setInterval(update, tickRate);
},
resumeTimer = () => {
initialTime = now() - (pauseTime - initialTime);
intervalId = setInterval(update, tickRate);
},
pauseTimer = () => {
clearInterval(intervalId);
intervalId = null;
pauseTime = now();
},
stopTimer = () => {
clearInterval(intervalId);
intervalId = null;
initialTime = undefined;
pauseTime = 0;
},
restartTimer = () => {
stopTimer();
startTimer();
};
const setButtonState = (button, state, text) => {
button.dataset.state = state;
button.textContent = text;
};
const
handleToggle = (e) => {
switch (e.target.dataset.state) {
case 'pause':
setButtonState(e.target, 'resume', 'Resume');
pauseTimer();
break;
case 'resume':
setButtonState(e.target, 'pause', 'Pause');
resumeTimer();
break;
default:
setButtonState(e.target, 'pause', 'Pause');
restartTimer();
}
},
handleStop = (e) => {
stopTimer();
update();
setButtonState(toggleAction, 'initial', 'Start');
};
toggleAction.addEventListener('click', handleToggle);
stopAction.addEventListener('click', handleStop);
update();
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
body {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
background: #000;
}
.timer {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
gap: 0.5em;
}
.timer .timer-display {
font-family: monospace;
font-size: 3em;
background: #111;
color: #8F8;
border: thin solid #222;
padding: 0.25em;
}
.timer .timer-actions {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
gap: 0.5em;
}
.timer .timer-actions button[data-action] {
font-family: monospace;
width: 6em;
border: thin solid #444;
background: #222;
color: #EEE;
padding: 0.5em;
cursor: pointer;
text-transform: uppercase;
}
.timer .timer-actions button[data-action]:hover {
background: #444;
border: thin solid #666;
color: #FFF;
}
<div class="timer">
<div class="timer-display"></div>
<div class="timer-actions">
<button data-action="toggle" data-state="initial">Start</button>
<button data-action="stop">Stop</button>
</div>
</div>
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 1657
It is quite old question but I encountered the same issue.
If you run your web on chrome, you could read through this post Background Tabs in Chrome 57.
Basically the interval timer could run if it haven't run out of the timer budget.
The consumption of budget is based on CPU time usage of the task inside timer.
Based on my scenario, I draw video to canvas and transport to WebRTC.
The webrtc video connection would keep updating even the tab is inactive.
However you have to use setInterval
instead of requestAnimationFrame
but itt is not recommended for UI rendering though.
It would be better to listen visibilityChange
event and change render mechenism accordingly.
Besides, you could try what Kaan Soral suggests and it should works based on the documentation.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 41
I bring here a simple solution for anyone who is trying to get around this problem in a timer function, where as @kbtzr mentioned in another answer we can use the Date object instead of fixed increments to calculate the time that has passed since the beginning, which will work even if you are out from the application's tab.
This is the example HTML.
<body>
<p id="time"></p>
</body>
Then this JavaScript:
let display = document.querySelector('#time')
let interval
let time
function startTimer() {
let initialTime = new Date().getTime()
interval = setInterval(() => {
let now = new Date().getTime()
time = (now - initialTime) + 10
display.innerText = `${Math.floor((time / (60 * 1000)) % 60)}:${Math.floor((time / 1000) % 60)}:${Math.floor((time / 10) % 100)}`
}, 10)
}
startTimer()
That way, even if the interval value is increased for performance reasons of inactive tabs, the calculation made will guarantee the correct time. This is a vanilla code, but I used this logic in my React application, and you can modify it for wherever you need as well.
Upvotes: 4
Reputation: 7896
There is a workaround for this problem, although actually the tab must be made active in some window.
This should give the browser the impression of always being active.
This is bit cumbersome, but also a quick win. Provided one has control over windows arrangement.
Upvotes: -2
Reputation: 961
I ran into the same problem with audio fading and HTML5 player. It got stuck when tab became inactive. So I found out a WebWorker is allowed to use intervals/timeouts without limitation. I use it to post "ticks" to the main javascript.
WebWorkers Code:
var fading = false;
var interval;
self.addEventListener('message', function(e){
switch (e.data) {
case 'start':
if (!fading){
fading = true;
interval = setInterval(function(){
self.postMessage('tick');
}, 50);
}
break;
case 'stop':
clearInterval(interval);
fading = false;
break;
};
}, false);
Main Javascript:
var player = new Audio();
player.fader = new Worker('js/fader.js');
player.faderPosition = 0.0;
player.faderTargetVolume = 1.0;
player.faderCallback = function(){};
player.fadeTo = function(volume, func){
console.log('fadeTo called');
if (func) this.faderCallback = func;
this.faderTargetVolume = volume;
this.fader.postMessage('start');
}
player.fader.addEventListener('message', function(e){
console.log('fader tick');
if (player.faderTargetVolume > player.volume){
player.faderPosition -= 0.02;
} else {
player.faderPosition += 0.02;
}
var newVolume = Math.pow(player.faderPosition - 1, 2);
if (newVolume > 0.999){
player.volume = newVolume = 1.0;
player.fader.postMessage('stop');
player.faderCallback();
} else if (newVolume < 0.001) {
player.volume = newVolume = 0.0;
player.fader.postMessage('stop');
player.faderCallback();
} else {
player.volume = newVolume;
}
});
Upvotes: 96
Reputation: 13260
On most browsers inactive tabs have low priority execution and this can affect JavaScript timers.
If the values of your transition were calculated using real time elapsed between frames instead fixed increments on each interval, you not only workaround this issue but also can achieve a smother animation by using requestAnimationFrame as it can get up to 60fps if the processor isn't very busy.
Here's a vanilla JavaScript example of an animated property transition using requestAnimationFrame
:
var target = document.querySelector('div#target')
var startedAt, duration = 3000
var domain = [-100, window.innerWidth]
var range = domain[1] - domain[0]
function start() {
startedAt = Date.now()
updateTarget(0)
requestAnimationFrame(update)
}
function update() {
let elapsedTime = Date.now() - startedAt
// playback is a value between 0 and 1
// being 0 the start of the animation and 1 its end
let playback = elapsedTime / duration
updateTarget(playback)
if (playback > 0 && playback < 1) {
// Queue the next frame
requestAnimationFrame(update)
} else {
// Wait for a while and restart the animation
setTimeout(start, duration/10)
}
}
function updateTarget(playback) {
// Uncomment the line below to reverse the animation
// playback = 1 - playback
// Update the target properties based on the playback position
let position = domain[0] + (playback * range)
target.style.left = position + 'px'
target.style.top = position + 'px'
target.style.transform = 'scale(' + playback * 3 + ')'
}
start()
body {
overflow: hidden;
}
div {
position: absolute;
white-space: nowrap;
}
<div id="target">...HERE WE GO</div>
@UpTheCreek comment:
Fine for presentation issues, but still there are some things that you need to keep running.
If you have background tasks that needs to be precisely executed at given intervals, you can use HTML5 Web Workers. Take a look at Möhre's answer below for more details...
This problem and many others could be avoided by using CSS transitions/animations instead of JavaScript based animations which adds a considerable overhead. I'd recommend this jQuery plugin that let's you take benefit from CSS transitions just like the animate()
methods.
Upvotes: 188
Reputation: 22308
Both setInterval
and requestAnimationFrame
don't work when tab is inactive or work but not at the right periods. A solution is to use another source for time events. For example web sockets or web workers are two event sources that work fine while tab is inactive. So no need to move all of your code to a web worker, just use worker as a time event source:
// worker.js
setInterval(function() {
postMessage('');
}, 1000 / 50);
.
var worker = new Worker('worker.js');
var t1 = 0;
worker.onmessage = function() {
var t2 = new Date().getTime();
console.log('fps =', 1000 / (t2 - t1) | 0);
t1 = t2;
}
jsfiddle link of this sample.
Upvotes: 23
Reputation: 319
For me it's not important to play audio in the background like for others here, my problem was that I had some animations and they acted like crazy when you were in other tabs and coming back to them. My solution was putting these animations inside if that is preventing inactive tab:
if (!document.hidden){ //your animation code here }
thanks to that my animation was running only if tab was active. I hope this will help someone with my case.
Upvotes: 17
Reputation: 1665
Playing an audio file ensures full background Javascript performance for the time being
For me, it was the simplest and least intrusive solution - apart from playing a faint / almost-empty sound, there are no other potential side effects
You can find the details here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/51191818/914546
(From other answers, I see that some people use different properties of the Audio tag, I do wonder whether it's possible to use the Audio tag for full performance, without actually playing something)
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 1223
There is a solution to use Web Workers (as mentioned before), because they run in separate process and are not slowed down
I've written a tiny script that can be used without changes to your code - it simply overrides functions setTimeout, clearTimeout, setInterval, clearInterval.
Just include it before all your code.
Upvotes: 62
Reputation: 5924
Heavily influenced by Ruslan Tushov's library, I've created my own small library. Just add the script in the <head>
and it will patch setInterval
and setTimeout
with ones that use WebWorker
.
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 11
I was able to call my callback function at minimum of 250ms using audio tag and handling its ontimeupdate event. Its called 3-4 times in a second. Its better than one second lagging setTimeout
Upvotes: -1
Reputation: 1920
Here's my rough solution
(function(){
var index = 1;
var intervals = {},
timeouts = {};
function postMessageHandler(e) {
window.postMessage('', "*");
var now = new Date().getTime();
sysFunc._each.call(timeouts, function(ind, obj) {
var targetTime = obj[1];
if (now >= targetTime) {
obj[0]();
delete timeouts[ind];
}
});
sysFunc._each.call(intervals, function(ind, obj) {
var startTime = obj[1];
var func = obj[0];
var ms = obj[2];
if (now >= startTime + ms) {
func();
obj[1] = new Date().getTime();
}
});
}
window.addEventListener("message", postMessageHandler, true);
window.postMessage('', "*");
function _setTimeout(func, ms) {
timeouts[index] = [func, new Date().getTime() + ms];
return index++;
}
function _setInterval(func, ms) {
intervals[index] = [func, new Date().getTime(), ms];
return index++;
}
function _clearInterval(ind) {
if (intervals[ind]) {
delete intervals[ind]
}
}
function _clearTimeout(ind) {
if (timeouts[ind]) {
delete timeouts[ind]
}
}
var intervalIndex = _setInterval(function() {
console.log('every 100ms');
}, 100);
_setTimeout(function() {
console.log('run after 200ms');
}, 200);
_setTimeout(function() {
console.log('closing the one that\'s 100ms');
_clearInterval(intervalIndex)
}, 2000);
window._setTimeout = _setTimeout;
window._setInterval = _setInterval;
window._clearTimeout = _clearTimeout;
window._clearInterval = _clearInterval;
})();
Upvotes: -1
Reputation: 51
I think that a best understanding about this problem is in this example: http://jsfiddle.net/TAHDb/
I am doing a simple thing here:
Have a interval of 1 sec and each time hide the first span and move it to last, and show the 2nd span.
If you stay on page it works as it is supposed. But if you hide the tab for some seconds, when you get back you will see a weired thing.
Its like all events that didn't ucur during the time you were inactive now will ocur all in 1 time. so for some few seconds you will get like X events. they are so quick that its possible to see all 6 spans at once.
So it seams chrome only delays the events, so when you get back all events will occur but all at once...
A pratical application were this ocur iss for a simple slideshow. Imagine the numbers being Images, and if user stay with tab hidden when he came back he will see all imgs floating, Totally mesed.
To fix this use the stop(true,true) like pimvdb told. THis will clear the event queue.
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 4125
Just do this:
var $div = $('div');
var a = 0;
setInterval(function() {
a++;
$div.stop(true,true).css("left", a);
}, 1000 / 30);
Inactive browser tabs buffer some of the setInterval
or setTimeout
functions.
stop(true,true)
will stop all buffered events and execute immediatly only the last animation.
The window.setTimeout()
method now clamps to send no more than one timeout per second in inactive tabs. In addition, it now clamps nested timeouts to the smallest value allowed by the HTML5 specification: 4 ms (instead of the 10 ms it used to clamp to).
Upvotes: 15