In SQL, what's the difference between count(column) and count(*)?

Question

I have the following query:

select column_name, count(column_name)
from table
group by column_name
having count(column_name) > 1;

What would be the difference if I replaced all calls to count(column_name) to count(*)?

This question was inspired by How do I find duplicate values in a table in Oracle?.

---

To clarify the accepted answer (and maybe my question), replacing count(column_name) with count(*) would return an extra row in the result that contains a null and the count of null values in the column.

Answer 1

The explanation in the docs, helps to explain this:

COUNT(*) returns the number of items in a group, including NULL values and duplicates.

COUNT(expression) evaluates expression for each row in a group and returns the number of nonnull values.

So count(*) includes nulls, the other method doesn't.

Answer 2

Further elaborating upon the answer given by @SQLMeance and @Brannon making use of GROUP BY clause which has been mentioned by OP but not present in answer by @SQLMenace

CREATE TABLE table1 ( 
id INT 
);

INSERT INTO table1 VALUES 
(1), 
(2), 
(NULL), 
(2), 
(NULL), 
(3), 
(1), 
(4), 
(NULL), 
(2);

SELECT * FROM table1;

+------+
| id   |
+------+
|    1 |
|    2 |
| NULL |
|    2 |
| NULL |
|    3 |
|    1 |
|    4 |
| NULL |
|    2 |
+------+
10 rows in set (0.00 sec)

SELECT id, COUNT(*) FROM table1 GROUP BY id;

+------+----------+
| id   | COUNT(*) |
+------+----------+
|    1 |        2 |
|    2 |        3 |
| NULL |        3 |
|    3 |        1 |
|    4 |        1 |
+------+----------+
5 rows in set (0.00 sec)

Here, COUNT(*) counts the number of occurrences of each type of id including NULL

SELECT id, COUNT(id) FROM table1 GROUP BY id;

+------+-----------+
| id   | COUNT(id) |
+------+-----------+
|    1 |         2 |
|    2 |         3 |
| NULL |         0 |
|    3 |         1 |
|    4 |         1 |
+------+-----------+
5 rows in set (0.00 sec)

Here, COUNT(id) counts the number of occurrences of each type of id but does not count the number of occurrences of NULL

SELECT id, COUNT(DISTINCT id) FROM table1 GROUP BY id;

+------+--------------------+
| id   | COUNT(DISTINCT id) |
+------+--------------------+
| NULL |                  0 |
|    1 |                  1 |
|    2 |                  1 |
|    3 |                  1 |
|    4 |                  1 |
+------+--------------------+
5 rows in set (0.00 sec)

Here, COUNT(DISTINCT id) counts the number of occurrences of each type of id only once (does not count duplicates) and also does not count the number of occurrences of NULL

Answer 3

Basically the COUNT(*) function return all the rows from a table whereas COUNT(COLUMN_NAME) does not; that is it excludes null values which everyone here have also answered here. But the most interesting part is to make queries and database optimized it is better to use COUNT(*) unless doing multiple counts or a complex query rather than COUNT(COLUMN_NAME). Otherwise, it will really lower your DB performance while dealing with a huge number of data.

Answer 4

COUNT(*) – Returns the total number of records in a table (Including NULL valued records).

COUNT(Column Name) – Returns the total number of Non-NULL records. It means that, it ignores counting NULL valued records in that particular column.

Answer 5

We can use the Stack Exchange Data Explorer to illustrate the difference with a simple query. The Users table in Stack Overflow's database has columns that are often left blank, like the user's Website URL.

-- count(column_name) vs. count(*)
-- Illustrates the difference between counting a column
-- that can hold null values, a  'not null' column, and  count(*)

select count(WebsiteUrl), count(Id), count(*) from Users

If you run the query above in the Data Explorer, you'll see that the count is the same for count(Id) and count(*)because the Id column doesn't allow null values. The WebsiteUrl count is much lower, though, because that column allows null.

Answer 6

As mentioned in the previous answers, Count(*) counts even the NULL columns, whereas count(Columnname) counts only if the column has values.

It's always best practice to avoid * (Select *, count *, …)

Answer 7

There is no difference if one column is fix in your table, if you want to use more than one column than you have to specify that how much columns you required to count......

Thanks,

Answer 8

It is best to use

Count(1) in place of column name or * 

to count the number of rows in a table, it is faster than any format because it never go to check the column name into table exists or not

Answer 9

• The COUNT(*) sentence indicates SQL Server to return all the rows from a table, including NULLs.
• COUNT(column_name) just retrieves the rows having a non-null value on the rows.

Please see following code for test executions SQL Server 2008:

-- Variable table
DECLARE @Table TABLE
(
      CustomerId int NULL 
    , Name nvarchar(50) NULL
)

-- Insert some records for tests
INSERT INTO @Table VALUES( NULL, 'Pedro')
INSERT INTO @Table VALUES( 1, 'Juan')
INSERT INTO @Table VALUES( 2, 'Pablo')
INSERT INTO @Table VALUES( 3, 'Marcelo')
INSERT INTO @Table VALUES( NULL, 'Leonardo')
INSERT INTO @Table VALUES( 4, 'Ignacio')

-- Get all the collumns by indicating *
SELECT  COUNT(*) AS 'AllRowsCount'
FROM    @Table

-- Get only content columns ( exluce NULLs )
SELECT  COUNT(CustomerId) AS 'OnlyNotNullCounts'
FROM    @Table

Answer 10

count(*) counts NULLs and count(column) does not

[edit] added this code so that people can run it

create table #bla(id int,id2 int)
insert #bla values(null,null)
insert #bla values(1,null)
insert #bla values(null,1)
insert #bla values(1,null)
insert #bla values(null,1)
insert #bla values(1,null)
insert #bla values(null,null)

select count(*),count(id),count(id2)
from #bla

results 7 3 2

Answer 11

A further and perhaps subtle difference is that in some database implementations the count(*) is computed by looking at the indexes on the table in question rather than the actual data rows. Since no specific column is specified, there is no need to bother with the actual rows and their values (as there would be if you counted a specific column). Allowing the database to use the index data can be significantly faster than making it count "real" rows.

Answer 12

Another minor difference, between using * and a specific column, is that in the column case you can add the keyword DISTINCT, and restrict the count to distinct values:

select column_a, count(distinct column_b)
from table
group by column_a
having count(distinct column_b) > 1;