Reputation: 93
I would like to use redirect the flow to a local function and then returning to the original one using a shellcode.
I defined two simple functions and use objdump to get their assembly code:
// unsigned char *g_code = "\x55\x48\x89\xe5\xb8\x2a\x00\x00\x00\x5d\xc3";
int g() {
return 42;
}
// unsigned char *f_code_original = "\x55\x48\x89\xe5\x48\x83\xec\x10\xb8\x00\x00\x00\x00\xe8\x00\x00\x00\x00\x89\x45\xfc\xb8\x2a\x00\x00\x00\xc9\xc3";
int f() {
int x = g();
return 42;
}
In a different file, I have a function that I want to call between the two instructions of f:
void redirect() {
FILE *out = fopen("redirect.txt", "w");
fprintf(out, "REDIRECT WORKED");
fclose(out);
}
For that I use the following code, compiled with -fPIC -fno-stack-protector -z execstack:
void f_func() {
unsigned char *f_code_original = "\x55\x48\x89\xe5\x48\x83\xec\x10\xb8\x00\x00\x00\x00\xe8\x00\x00\x00\x00\x89\x45\xfc\xb8\x2a\x00\x00\x00\xc9\xc3";
unsigned char f_code_modified[] = "\x55\x48\x89\xe5\x48\x83\xec\x10\xb8\x00\x00\x00\x00\xe8\xfb\xfe\xff\xff\xb8\x00\x00\x00\x00\xe8\x00\x00\x00\x00\x89\x45\xfc\x8b\x45\xfc\xc9\xc3";
int value = 0;
int (*f)() = (int (*)())f_code_modified;
value = f();
printf("%d\n", value);
}
If I use the original code of f (as I got it from objdump) it works. I wanted to modify it in order to call my redirect function, then resume the current execution.
Assembly code (for f_code_modified):
0: 55 push ebp
1: 48 dec eax
2: 89 e5 mov ebp,esp
4: 48 dec eax
5: 83 ec 10 sub esp,0x10
8: b8 00 00 00 00 mov eax,0x0 <==
d: e8 fb fe ff ff call 0xffffff0d <==
12: b8 00 00 00 00 mov eax,0x0
17: e8 00 00 00 00 call 0x1c
1c: 89 45 fc mov DWORD PTR [ebp-0x4],eax
1f: 8b 45 fc mov eax,DWORD PTR [ebp-0x4]
22: c9 leave
23: c3 ret
This looks similar if I make the calls directly from main (int x = g(); redirect(); return 42;), but I think that the call instruction at d: e8 .. .. .. .. is relative the current instruction pointer.
If I run the program like this it gives segmentation fault.
Question: Is there a way I can find the current instruction pointer at runtime, then write the shellcode as \xe8\x??\x??\x??\x?? to call the function redirect? What do I have to modify? I have already tried with -fPIC and getting the address of redirect (using &), but it doesn't work.
Upvotes: 0
Views: 1373
Reputation: 563
Following Peter Cordes comment, you could embed the absolute address of the target function into the shellcode.
To find function address redirect()
, I'm using nm
, so the command is :
% nm <binary> | grep redirect
Output : 080484bb T redirect
So, I rewrite your shellcode to modify, something adding redirect()
function address :
test_shellcode :
push ebp
dec eax
mov ebp,esp
dec eax
sub esp,0x10
mov eax,0x080484bb ; redirect() function address
call eax
mov dword [ebp-0x4],eax
mov eax,dword [ebp-0x4]
leave
ret
test_shellcode2 :
push ebp
dec eax
mov ebp,esp
dec eax
sub esp,0x10
mov eax,0x80484bb ; redirect() function address
call eax
mov eax,0x0
call 0x1c
mov dword [ebp-0x4],eax
mov eax,dword [ebp-0x4]
leave
ret
Here, I modified your code :
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
void redirect() {
FILE *out = fopen("redirect.txt", "w");
fprintf(out, "REDIRECT WORKED");
fclose(out);
}
void f_func() {
// unsigned char *f_code_original = "\x55\x48\x89\xe5\x48\x83\xec\x10\xb8\x00\x00\x00\x00\xe8\x00\x00\x00\x00\x89\x45\xfc\xb8\x2a\x00\x00\x00\xc9\xc3";
// unsigned char f_code_modified[] = "\x55\x48\x89\xe5\x48\x83\xec\x10\xb8\x00\x00\x00\x00\xe8\xbb\x84\x04\x08\xb8\x00\x00\x00\x00\xe8\x00\x00\x00\x00\x89\x45\xfc\x8b\x45\xfc\xc9\xc3";
// Here shellcode, I wrote :
unsigned char *test_shellcode = "\x55\x48\x89\xe5\x48\x83\xec\x10\xb8\xbb\x84\x04\x08\xff\xd0\x89\x45\xfc\x8b\x45\xfc\xc9\xc3";
// unsigned char *test_shellcode2 = "\x55\x48\x89\xe5\x48\x83\xec\x10\xb8\xbb\x84\x04\x08\xff\xd0\xb8\x00\x00\x00\x00\xe8\xa3\x7f\xfb\xf7\x89\x45\xfc\x8b\x45\xfc\xc9\xc3";
int value = 0;
int (*f)() = (int (*)())test_shellcode;
value = f();
printf("%d\n", value);
}
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
f_func();
}
Compile with -fPIC -fno-stack-protector -z execstack
, so yeah it's work. This is for example I'm using test_shellcode :
% ls -l
total 16
-rwxrwxr-x 1 febri febri 7548 Jan 1 08:40 shell
-rw-rw-r-- 1 febri febri 1075 Jan 1 08:39 shell.c
drwxrwxr-x 2 febri febri 4096 Jan 1 08:16 shellcode
% ./shell
0
% ls -l
total 20
-rw-rw-r-- 1 febri febri 15 Jan 1 08:41 redirect.txt
-rwxrwxr-x 1 febri febri 7548 Jan 1 08:40 shell
-rw-rw-r-- 1 febri febri 1075 Jan 1 08:39 shell.c
drwxrwxr-x 2 febri febri 4096 Jan 1 08:16 shellcode
% cat redirect.txt
REDIRECT WORKED
But, if I'm using test_shellcode2, I get Segmentation fault
, but It's work :
% ls -l
total 16
-rwxrwxr-x 1 febri febri 7548 Jan 1 08:46 shell
-rw-rw-r-- 1 febri febri 1076 Jan 1 08:46 shell.c
drwxrwxr-x 2 febri febri 4096 Jan 1 08:16 shellcode
% ./shell
[1] 7465 segmentation fault (core dumped) ./shell
% ls -l
total 20
-rw-rw-r-- 1 febri febri 15 Jan 1 08:46 redirect.txt
-rwxrwxr-x 1 febri febri 7548 Jan 1 08:46 shell
-rw-rw-r-- 1 febri febri 1076 Jan 1 08:46 shell.c
drwxrwxr-x 2 febri febri 4096 Jan 1 08:16 shellcode
% cat redirect.txt
REDIRECT WORKED %
Upvotes: 1