CODEWITHSUNDEEP
angularlodashpackage.jsondefinitelytyped
user2846469
user2846469

Reputation: 2220

Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'lodash-es'

In my Angular 8 TypeScript code I was importing lodash directy (e.g. import * as _ from 'lodash';). In my package.json I had "lodash": "^4.17.15".

I decided to install the @types/lodash-es module and import the specific lodash functions that way (e.g. import { map } from 'lodash-es';). It is better because it saves runtime space and also uses the standard Angular/TypeScript import mechanism.

However, now when I run a build I am getting this error:

Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'lodash-es'

How can I fix this error?

Upvotes: 8

Views: 19356

Answers (5)

Yacine Aoumara
Yacine Aoumara

Reputation: 1

i fix it by runing inside nova-component/....Field

npm run nova:install
npm audit
npm run watch

Upvotes: 0

Christian Wechsel
Christian Wechsel

Reputation: 13

If you are using Formik together with Webpack and encounter a problem, configuring resolve.extensions in your Webpack configuration might help. Here is an example of how you can do this: By adding the desired file extensions .js to resolve.extensions, Webpack will ensure that these file types are resolved correctly during bundling. This can be especially useful if you are using Formik in a React application written in TypeScript.

Upvotes: 0

SGhosh
SGhosh

Reputation: 41

you can update your node__modules by npm update. It has removed the error for my case.

Upvotes: 0

Jakub Tomáš
Jakub Tomáš

Reputation: 11

Try this

npm install @types/lodash-es --save-dev

If after this you will have the same problem please check the package.json that you have in dependencies

"lodash-es": "^4.17.20"

when you dont have, just write and run npm install in cmd . This work for me.

Upvotes: 1

user2846469
user2846469

Reputation: 2220

In addition to installing the @types/lodash-es module, the existing "lodash": "^4.17.15" module needs to be replaced with "lodash-es": "^4.17.15"

This is because @types/lodash-es requires lodash-es and not lodash. This is obvious once you know it but I missed it originally.

Upvotes: 10

Related Questions