Reputation: 557
In the example for Acumatica: "Lesson 2.1: Updating a Customer Account" the sample code will update the customer's Contact info, based on retrieving it by the email address. It expands the MainContact and selects CustomerID and CustomerClass:
https://localhost/MyStoreInstance/entity/Default/18.200.001/Customer?$filter=MainContact/Email eq '[email protected]'&$expand=MainContact&$select=CustomerID,CustomerClass
The values that are returned include CustomerID, CustomerClass PLUS a fully loaded BillingContact record, comprising 2150 Bytes of data like this:
{
"id": "0b88d208-297a-4b81-a20c-39d27bace10a",
"rowNumber": 1,
"note": "",
"BillingContact": {
"id": "e1133b8a-fca9-4885-8e4c-09a85808f025",
"rowNumber": 1,
"note": null,
"Activities": [],
"Address": {
"id": "4f1719aa-6eb0-4551-a143-ad2139e135aa",
"rowNumber": 1,
"note": null,
"AddressLine1": {
"value": "1000 Pennsylvania Ave"
},
"AddressLine2": {},
"City": {
"value": "San Francisco"
},
"Country": {
"value": "US"
},
"PostalCode": {
"value": "94107-3479"
},
"State": {
"value": "CA"
},
"custom": {},
"files": []
},
"Attention": {
"value": "Mister. Jack Green"
},
"Attributes": [],
"Campaigns": [],
"Cases": [],
"ContactID": {
"value": 12417
},
"DisplayName": {
"value": "Jevy Computers"
},
"Duplicates": [],
"Email": {
"value": "[email protected]"
},
"Fax": {},
"FirstName": {},
"JobTitle": {
"value": ""
},
"LastName": {},
"MarketingLists": [],
"MiddleName": {},
"Notifications": [],
"Opportunities": [],
"Phone1": {
"value": "+1 (777) 380-0089"
},
"Phone1Type": {
"value": "Business 1"
},
"Phone2": {},
"Phone2Type": {
"value": "Business 2"
},
"Relations": [],
"Title": {},
"UserInfo": null,
"WebSite": {},
"custom": {},
"files": []
},
"BillingContactSameAsMain": {
"value": false
},
"CustomerClass": {
"value": "INTL"
},
"CustomerID": {
"value": "C000000003"
},
"custom": {},
"files": []
}
However, when I explicitly ask for BillingContact to be Expanded, I get LESS information than I get when I omit it from the EXPAND command altogether. (I get 1235 bytes in return.)
{
"id": "0b88d208-297a-4b81-a20c-39d27bace10a",
"rowNumber": 1,
"note": "",
"BillingContact": {
"id": "e1133b8a-fca9-4885-8e4c-09a85808f025",
"rowNumber": 1,
"note": null,
"Attention": {
"value": "Mr. Jack Green"
},
"ContactID": {
"value": 12417
},
"DisplayName": {
"value": "Jevy Computers"
},
"Email": {
"value": "[email protected]"
},
"Fax": {},
"FirstName": {},
"JobTitle": {
"value": ""
},
"LastName": {},
"MiddleName": {},
"Phone1": {
"value": "+1 (777) 380-0089"
},
"Phone1Type": {
"value": "Business 1"
},
"Phone2": {},
"Phone2Type": {
"value": "Business 2"
},
"Title": {},
"WebSite": {},
"custom": {},
"files": []
},
"BillingContactSameAsMain": {
"value": false
},
"CustomerClass": {
"value": "INTL"
},
"CustomerID": {
"value": "C000000003"
},
"custom": {},
"files": []
}
Clearly I do not understand how the expand command is operating in a PUT. Can anyone explain it to me?
Why does including BillingContact in the expand command give me less BillingContact information?
Upvotes: 0
Views: 293
Reputation: 1712
When you execute a Put request, Acumatica automatically add expands for the entities your are touching, including subentities, so you see Address under BillingContact
.
When you add expand on the billing contact, it overrides the default expands and you do not see Address
any more.
To get Address
in the result, you add another expand : BillingContact/Address
Same applies to all other entities
Upvotes: 2