Reputation: 31
I wonder whether it is possible to style a paragraph not preceded by a heading?
I guess the rule would look something like this:
p (direction for "without/not preceded by") h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 {
Or... does the rule have to be written for the opposite:
h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 + p {
...therefore paragraphs could have the style desired for a paragraph not preceded by a heading, by default.
Kind Regards, Dale
Upvotes: 3
Views: 3373
Reputation: 11
Thanks for the suggestions guys.
I felt that there was some selector that would do the job, but it looks very dodgy to use that one.
I will go with:
p {
and then, lower in the cascade:
h1 + p, h2 + p, h3 + p, h4 + p, h5 + p, h6 + p {
Annoying that the
p {
is the exception rather than the rule : D
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 34855
Sure. Style all your paragraphs the way you would like them to appear without headings preceding them:
p {//styles here}
Then, farther down in the stylesheet, add the styles for paragraphs preceded by headers:
h1 + p, h2 + p, etc {//styles here}
The regular paragraphs will be styled as you want them. The ones with preceding headers will get the later styles.
EDIT: I should add that the later styles will inherit from the earlier styles, so you will need to overwrite certain rules... for instance, if you have background-color: red
on all your p
tags but you do not want a red background on the p
that are preceded by an h
, then you need to set that background-color
to none
or another color, etc.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 177550
I'm pretty sure you have to write the opposite, as you described. Two important points, however:
The first solution that comes to my mind is using :not
, or the negation pseudo-class. However, it only takes a simple selector, so
:not(h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6) + p
would be illegal.
As you have written your second selector, the + p
term only applies to the h6
; paste it into the SelectORacle to see. The correct selector would be
h1 + p, h2 + p, h3 + p, h4 + p, h5 + p, h6 + p
Upvotes: 5