Rob Stevenson-Leggett
Rob Stevenson-Leggett

Reputation: 35689

ASP.NET MVC 3: Override "name" attribute with TextBoxFor

Is it possible when using Html.TextBoxFor to override the name attribute?

I have tried with no success. I need to use TextBoxFor to get client side validation to work, however for reasons I won't go into I need the name of the textbox to be different from the generated one.

I have tried the following:

@Html.TextBoxFor(x => x.Data, new { name = Model.Key + "_Data", id = Model.Key + "_Data" })

Which works for ID but not name. Is this possible?

Update: Looking into the code for TextBoxFor. It doesn't look like there is an easy way. Hopefully someone can prove me wrong.

Upvotes: 115

Views: 86490

Answers (11)

Ali Adravi
Ali Adravi

Reputation: 22833

It is called Microsoft GOTCHA...

Use the name in caps, like this

@Html.TextBoxFor(m => m.Reply.Answer, new { Name = "Whatyouwant" })

Upvotes: 9

TroySteven
TroySteven

Reputation: 5157

Keep it simple, your already providing the ID you should simply be able to use the method "TextBox" instead of "TextBoxFor" and it will work fine client side and server side. In addition, although the accepted answer will work but will produce duplicate Name attributes on your tag if you inspect it using a browser. The below solution does not have that problem.

MvcHtmlString Html.TextBox(string name, string value, object htmlAttributes)

@Html.TextBox(Model.Key + "_Data", Model.Key, new { id = Model.Key + "_Data" }

Upvotes: 1

ScottLenart
ScottLenart

Reputation: 1210

For this example, I was disabling form fields based on permissions, but still showing them. I had a hidden field to send the value to the controller, but wanted a different field name in the EditorFor. First param after model value represents the "name" property, second is the new name.

@Html.EditorFor(m => m.UserName, "name", "UserNameDisabled", new { htmlAttributes = new { @class = "form-control", @disabled = "disabled"} });

Results in:

<input class="form-control text-box single-line" disabled="disabled" id="UserNameDisabled" name="UserNameDisabled" type="text" value="someEnteredValue" /> 

Upvotes: 1

Mr.Ajdos
Mr.Ajdos

Reputation: 11

@Html.EditorFor(Model => Model.Something, "name", "name", new {@class = "form-control" })

Not sure which of those two string parameters in the middle do the work, but it worked only when I typed both of them.

Upvotes: 1

James McCormack
James McCormack

Reputation: 9954

Are you asking this because you want to apply a prefix to the name? If so, you can do this by setting ViewData.TemplateInfo.HtmlFieldPrefix in your Controller.

I learnt a lot about this stuff from Brad Wilson's blog.

Upvotes: 44

Jonas
Jonas

Reputation: 59

For me, it works! I hope that help!

@Html.EditorFor(model => model.Nome, new { htmlAttributes = new { @class = "form-control", @maxlength = "80", @id = "NomeFilter", @Name = "NomeFilter" } })

Upvotes: 2

Protector one
Protector one

Reputation: 7331

EditorFor has an overload where you can supply the name attribute as a parameter:

 @Html.EditorFor(expression, null, name)

Upvotes: 15

anar khalilov
anar khalilov

Reputation: 17498

Rob, actually there is a much simpler way. Instead of name, use Name:

@Html.TextBoxFor(x => x.Data, new { Name = Model.Key + "_Data", id = Model.Key + "_Data" })

Upvotes: 259

Rip Ryness
Rip Ryness

Reputation: 651

ben's answer got me what I was looking for except you need to wrap in in Html.Raw

@Html.Raw(Html.TextBoxFor(x => x.Data).ToString().Replace("Data", "NewData"))

Upvotes: 7

benwasd
benwasd

Reputation: 1352

a little bit "unpretty"=), try:

@Html.TextBoxFor(x => x.Data).ToString().Replace("Data", "NewData")

Upvotes: 4

archil
archil

Reputation: 39501

Try EditorFor. you can pass string as template name if you want to make sure textbox is rendered even if property type is not string. If property is string already, it does not need templatename explicitly to render textbox, so you can pass null. Note that it does not require id parameter explicitly, it will infer it from element name. And all the validation things are still active with EditorFor

 @Html.EditorFor(x => x.Data, "string", Model.Key + "_Data")

Upvotes: 8

Related Questions