Reputation: 18178
I'm using the Entity Framework with Code First approach. The base class DbContext has functions to create and delete the database as well as to check for its existence.
I want to check if a special table (entity) is existing or not. Is it possible with an framework implementation or do I need to write custom methods? If I need to write my own implementation, what would be the most generic approach to do that?
Thanks for any help.
Upvotes: 28
Views: 50463
Reputation: 1333
Here's an extension method for doing this in EF Core (without Dapper):
public static async Task<bool> TableExists(this DbContext context, string tableName)
{
var connection = (SqlConnection)context.Database.GetDbConnection();
if (connection.State != ConnectionState.Open)
{
await connection.OpenAsync();
}
await using var command = connection.CreateCommand();
command.CommandText = $"SELECT COUNT(*) FROM sys.tables WHERE name = '{tableName}'";
var result = await command.ExecuteScalarAsync();
var count = (int)result;
return count > 0;
}
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 49
this code create all tables automatic if dose not exist
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
base.OnModelCreating(modelBuilder);
var x = modelBuilder.RegisterEntityType;
}
Upvotes: -2
Reputation: 31
In EF Core, I have added the TableExists method as a extension method for the DbContext class. Here is my solution using Dapper.
using System.Linq;
using Dapper;
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
public static class DbContextsExtensions
{
public static bool TableExists(this DbContext dbContext, string tableName)
{
var sqlQ = $"SELECT COUNT(*) as Count FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES WHERE TABLE_NAME = '{tableName}'";
var conn = dbContext.Database.GetDbConnection();
{
if (conn != null)
{
// Query - method extension provided by Dapper library
var count = conn.Query<int>(sqlQ).FirstOrDefault();
return (count > 0);
}
}
return false;
}
}
And here is an usage example:
if(context != null && context.TableExists("AppSettings"))
{
// do something;
}
Hope this help other people.
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 874
An alternative method; it's not as efficient as Ladislav's, but it's not tied to SQL Server (edited to add Where clause to address performance issue):
bool CheckTableExists()
{
try
{
context.YourTable.Where(s => s.<yourKeyField> = <impossible value>).Count();
return true;
}
catch (Exception)
{
return false;
}
}
Upvotes: 4
Reputation: 9927
I think following code is a little bit more understandable.
using(YourDbEntities db = new YourDbEntities())
{
bool IsExists = db.Database
.SqlQuery <int?> (@"
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES
WHERE TABLE_NAME = '" + yourTableName + "'
")
.FirstOrDefault() > 0;
return IsExists;
}
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 5839
Assumption: SQL Server
Catching any old exception when querying the DbSet
does not mean the table does not exist.
Querying a DbSet
where the table does not exist will throw an EntityCommandExecutionException
with an inner exception of type SqlException
. That inner exception has an ErrorNumber
property.
Error number 208 reads (source):
Invalid object name '%.*ls'.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 575
I can't add comment to previous post. I'm using SQL Compact and I don't know schema of the table. I'm using this code to check for table It's pretty the same that in previous post but It works for any table.
/// <summary>
/// Check if data table is exist in application
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">Class of data table to check</typeparam>
/// <param name="db">DB Object</param>
public static bool CheckTableExists<T>(this ModelLocker db) where T : class
{
try
{
db.Set<T>().Count();
return true;
}
catch (Exception)
{
return false;
}
}
Upvotes: 6
Reputation: 364249
If you need to check existence of the table you must call custom SQL code:
bool exists = context.Database
.SqlQuery<int?>(@"
SELECT 1 FROM sys.tables AS T
INNER JOIN sys.schemas AS S ON T.schema_id = S.schema_id
WHERE S.Name = 'SchemaName' AND T.Name = 'TableName'")
.SingleOrDefault() != null;
Table name is defined by default as the name of DbSet
exposed on your derived context but the default name can be overriden either by fluent API's ToTable
method or Table
data annotation.
Doing this in the generic way is not something supposed in code first approach. That will require browsing metadata and manually explore to which table is the entity mapped - this can be pretty complex because entity can be mapped to multiple tables. Code first doesn't offer access to metadata. You must convert DbContext
to ObjectContext
and browse MetadataWorkspace
.
Edit:
To convert DbContext
to ObjectContext
use this:
ObjectContext objContext = ((IObjectContextAdapter)dbContext).ObjectContext;
Upvotes: 43