CODEWITHSUNDEEP
javagenericsdiamond-operator
apadana
apadana

Reputation: 14690

Is it ok to omit diamond operator in recent java versions (8+)?

With Java 7 we could use the diamond operator: 

List<String> list = new ArrayList<>();

Now I am seeing in some recent codes people dropping the diamond operator: 

List<String> list = new ArrayList();

Is this a new feature added in more recent java versions (Java 8+) to drop the diamond operator? Or they are simply relying on the raw old ArrayList type (which just happens to work for backward compatibility reasons, and should be avoided)?

Upvotes: 4

Views: 2042

Answers (2)

Marius
Marius

Reputation: 90

The correct syntax (for what you want) is:

List<String> l1=new ArrayList<>();

Omitting the diamond operator means an unqualified list, which (under the hood is the same, of course, but) will give you a compiler warning.

Using it unqualified works against the compile-time type-checking system, and is not in accordance with the variable you declare with the diamond operator, but it will compile (and work if you do it right). That's why you will get a warning.

Upvotes: 1

dan1st
dan1st

Reputation: 16476

In my opinion, you should not omit it if possible but it works.

Ommitting it means using the raw type. At runtime, this makes no difference as generics are erased at compiletime but you may get compiler warnings and/or linter warnings/errors/fails because the <Object> type does not fit.

If you don't know the type or don't want to specify it, you can still use <? extends Object>.

The problem is if you want to do something like this:

List<String>[] data=new List<String>[16];

This does not work because you cannot instantiate arrays of generics easily.

In that case, I would leave out the type interference and ignore(suppress) the (possible) compiler warnings.

@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
List<String>[] data=new List[16];

But, as @vbezhenar mentioned in the comments:

It's better to avoid using arrays of generic types, just use something like List<List<String>> for that.

In general, Lists are easier to deal with than arrays, especially if you use generics.

Upvotes: 2

Related Questions