Reputation: 24758
I have this file:
100: pattern1
++++++++++++++++++++
1:pattern2
9:pattern2
+++++++++++++++++++
79: pattern1
61: pattern1
+++++++++++++++++++
and I want to sort it like this:
++++++++++++++++++++
1:pattern2
9:pattern2
+++++++++++++++++++
61:pattern1
79:pattern1
100:pattern1
+++++++++++++++++++
Is it possible using Linux sort command only ?
If I had :
4:pat1
3:pat2
2:pat2
1:pat1
O/p should be:
1:pat1
++++++++++++
2:pat2
3:pat2
++++++++++++
4:pat1
So, want to sort on first group, but "group" on the pattern of second group. Please note, the thing after : is a regex pattern not a literal.
Upvotes: 3
Views: 260
Reputation: 9996
I don't believe sort
alone can do what you need.
Create a new shell script and put this in its contents (ie mysort.sh
):
#!/bin/sh
IFS=$'\n' # This makes the for loop below split on newline instead of whitespace.
delim=+++++++++++++++++++
for l in `grep -v ^+| sort -g` # Ignore all + lines and sort by number
do
current=`echo $l | sed s/^[0-9]*://g` # Get what comes after the number
if [ ! -z "$prev" ] && [ "$prev" != "$current" ] # If it has changed...
then # then output a ++++ delimiter line.
echo $delim
fi
prev=$current
echo $l # Output this line.
done
To use it, pipe in the contents of your file like so:
cat input | sh mysort.sh
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 392921
If your input was space delimited, not ':' delimited:
sort -rk2 | uniq -D -f1
will do the grouping;
sort(1)
doesn't do composite key ordering. I do believe there are version that allow you to do sort -k2,1n
and you'd be done at once).--all-repeated=separate
instead of -D
to get blank separators between groups. Look at man uniq
for more ideas!However, since your input is colon delimited, a hack is required:
sed 's/\([0123456789]\+\):/\1 /' t | sort -rk2 | uniq -D -f1
HTH
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 45652
Best you can do is to sort it according to the numerical values. But you cannot do anything with the "+"-string.
$ sort -n input
+++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++
1:wow
9:wow
61: this is it
79: this is it
100: this is it
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 112366
Probably not -- it's not in the sort of format sort(1) expects. And if you did it would be one of those amazing hacks, not easily used. If you have some sort of rule for what goes between the lines of plus signs, you can do it readily enough with an AWK or Perl or Python script.
Upvotes: 0