Reputation: 3
I have the following code :
try{
line1; // can throw exception
line2; // can throw exception
line3; // can throw exception
line4; // can throw exception
}catch(Exception e){
handle exception;
}finally{
do remaining stuffs;
}
I need to execute all 4 lines inside try block even in case of exception from above lines.
Suppose the code encountered an exception in line2 of try block, even then I need to execute line3 and line4(which in turn can throw exceptions). Is there an easy way to do this instead of having multiple try-catch blocks.
Upvotes: 0
Views: 687
Reputation: 298173
The try with resource statement allows to specify actions that ought be executed even in the exceptional case, with a concise syntax (compared to nested finally
blocks). It also has another advantage: when multiple actions fail, the exceptions do not shadow each other but get registered as suppressed throwables at the primary throwable. A drawback is that resources are closed in the opposite order they were created, so we have to reverse the order of the lines:
public static void main(String[] args) {
for(int test = 0; test < 16; test++) {
int currentTest = test;
System.out.println("Test "+currentTest);
try(AutoCloseable c1 = () -> line4(currentTest); // 4
AutoCloseable c2 = () -> line3(currentTest); // 3
AutoCloseable c3 = () -> line2(currentTest)) { // 2
line1(currentTest); // 1
}
catch(Exception ex) {
System.out.print("got exception ");
ex.printStackTrace(System.out);
}
System.out.println();
}
}
public static void line1(int whichTest) {
if((whichTest & 1) != 0) {
System.out.println("letting line 1 fail");
throw new RuntimeException("line 1 failed");
} else System.out.println("line1 executed");
}
public static void line2(int whichTest) {
if((whichTest & 2) != 0) {
System.out.println("letting line 2 fail");
throw new RuntimeException("line 2 failed");
} else System.out.println("line2 executed");
}
public static void line3(int whichTest) {
if((whichTest & 4) != 0) {
System.out.println("letting line 3 fail");
throw new RuntimeException("line 3 failed");
} else System.out.println("line3 executed");
}
public static void line4(int whichTest) {
if((whichTest & 8) != 0) {
System.out.println("letting line 4 fail");
throw new RuntimeException("line 4 failed");
} else System.out.println("line4 executed");
}
This example program runs through all possible scenarios. I shortened the output to show only some of the examples:
Test 0
line1 executed
line2 executed
line3 executed
line4 executed
Test 1
letting line 1 fail
line2 executed
line3 executed
line4 executed
got exception java.lang.RuntimeException: line 1 failed
at SafeActions.line1(SafeActions.java:23)
at SafeActions.main(SafeActions.java:10)
Test 9
letting line 1 fail
line2 executed
line3 executed
letting line 4 fail
got exception java.lang.RuntimeException: line 1 failed
at SafeActions.line1(SafeActions.java:23)
at SafeActions.main(SafeActions.java:10)
Suppressed: java.lang.RuntimeException: line 4 failed
at SafeActions.line4(SafeActions.java:41)
at SafeActions.lambda$main$0(SafeActions.java:7)
at SafeActions.main(SafeActions.java:7)
Test 15
letting line 1 fail
letting line 2 fail
letting line 3 fail
letting line 4 fail
got exception java.lang.RuntimeException: line 1 failed
at SafeActions.line1(SafeActions.java:23)
at SafeActions.main(SafeActions.java:10)
Suppressed: java.lang.RuntimeException: line 2 failed
at SafeActions.line2(SafeActions.java:29)
at SafeActions.lambda$main$2(SafeActions.java:9)
at SafeActions.main(SafeActions.java:7)
Suppressed: java.lang.RuntimeException: line 3 failed
at SafeActions.line3(SafeActions.java:35)
at SafeActions.lambda$main$1(SafeActions.java:8)
at SafeActions.main(SafeActions.java:7)
Suppressed: java.lang.RuntimeException: line 4 failed
at SafeActions.line4(SafeActions.java:41)
at SafeActions.lambda$main$0(SafeActions.java:7)
at SafeActions.main(SafeActions.java:7)
A disadvantage of using the AutoCloseable
interface directly, is that it declares to potentially throw Exception
and hence, forces us to catch Exception
. If the actions don’t throw checked exception or a very specific type, it’s useful to create your own functional interface extending AutoCloseable
(In case of IOException
, there is already java.io.Closeable
).
interface MyAction extends AutoCloseable {
@Override public void close();
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
int currentTest = 11;
try(MyAction c1 = () -> line4(currentTest);
MyAction c2 = () -> line3(currentTest);
MyAction c3 = () -> line2(currentTest)) {
line1(currentTest);
}
}
Since this example doesn’t catch exceptions, I also removed the loop which wouldn’t get executed past the second iteration anyway.
letting line 1 fail
letting line 2 fail
line3 executed
letting line 4 fail
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: line 1 failed
at SafeActions.line1(SafeActions.java:17)
at SafeActions.main(SafeActions.java:11)
Suppressed: java.lang.RuntimeException: line 2 failed
at SafeActions.line2(SafeActions.java:23)
at SafeActions.lambda$main$2(SafeActions.java:10)
at SafeActions.main(SafeActions.java:8)
Suppressed: java.lang.RuntimeException: line 4 failed
at SafeActions.line4(SafeActions.java:35)
at SafeActions.lambda$main$0(SafeActions.java:8)
at SafeActions.main(SafeActions.java:8)
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 5581
You can have try/catch blocks within the outer try/catch block if it makes sense to. Something like this:
try{
line1; // can throw exception
try {
line2; // can throw exception
} catch (Exception e) {
if (e is a really bad one) throw e; // don't continue
else System.out.println("line2 failed but I'll keep going");
}
try {
line3; // can throw exception
} catch (Exception e) {
if (e is a really bad one) throw e; // don't continue
else System.out.println("line3 failed but I'll keep going");
}
line4; // can throw exception
}catch(Exception e){
handle exception;
}finally{
do remaining stuffs;
}
Upvotes: 1