Reputation: 2529
I am attempting to implement collision response in a simulation that I am creating. Basically, the program simulates a ball being thrown off a 50 meter building with some initial velocity.
I don't believe that the program is outputting realistic values for time of collision as well as values for x, y and vx, vy.
Here is the program:
#include<stdio.h>
#include<math.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
int main() {
FILE *fp;
FILE *fr;
//Declare and initialize all variables to be used
float ax = 0, ay = 0, x = 0, y = 0, vx = 0, vy = 0;
float time = 0, deltaTime = .001;
float vyImpact = 0, vxImpact = 0, xImpact = 0;
float old_y = 0, old_x = 0, old_vy = 0, old_vx = 0;
float deltaTime2 = 0, deltaTime3 = 0;
int numBounces = 0;
//Coefficient of Restitution; epsilon = ex = ey
float ex = .5;
float ey = .5;
fr = fopen("input_data.txt", "rt"); //Open file for reading
fp = fopen( "output_data.txt", "w" ); // Open file for writing
if(fr == NULL){ printf("File not found");} //if text file is not in directory...
if(fp == NULL){ printf("File not found");} //if text file is not in directory...
fscanf(fr, "ax: %f ay: %f x: %f y: %f vx: %f vy: %f\n", &ax, &ay, &x, &y, &vx, &vy);
while (numBounces < 9) {
//time = time + deltaTime
time = time + deltaTime;
//velocity[new] = velocity[old] + acc * deltaTime
vx = vx + ax*deltaTime;
vy = vy + ay*deltaTime;
//position[new] = position[old] + velocity*deltaTime + .5*acc*(deltaTime)^2
x = x + vx*deltaTime + (.5*ax*deltaTime*deltaTime);
y = y + vy*deltaTime + (.5*ay*deltaTime*deltaTime);
fprintf(fp, "%f\t%f\t%f\t%f\t%f\t%f\t%f\t\n", ax, ay, x, y, vx, vy, time);
//Collision occurs; implement collision response
if (y < 0) {
//"Undo" values for y, x, and velocity
old_y = y - vy*deltaTime - (.5*ay*deltaTime*deltaTime);
old_x = x - vx*deltaTime - (.5*ax*deltaTime*deltaTime);
old_vy = vy - ay*deltaTime;
old_vx = vx - ax*deltaTime;
//Calculate time of collision
deltaTime2 = (-old_y + sqrt((old_y*old_y) - 2*ay*old_y)) / (ay);
printf("Time of Collision = %f\n", time - deltaTime2);
//Calculate velocity and x position at collsion
vyImpact = old_vy + ay*deltaTime2;
vxImpact = old_vx + ax*deltaTime2;
xImpact = old_x + old_vx*deltaTime2 + .5*ax*(deltaTime2*deltaTime2);
//Calculate new time for when ball bounces
deltaTime3 = deltaTime - deltaTime2;
//Calculate new x and y position and velocity for when ball bounces
x = xImpact + (ex)*vxImpact*deltaTime3 + .5*ax*(deltaTime3*deltaTime3);
y = 0 + (-ey)*vyImpact*deltaTime3 + .5*ay*(deltaTime3*deltaTime3);
vy = (-ey)*vyImpact + ay*deltaTime3;
vx = (ex)*vxImpact + ax*deltaTime3;
numBounces++;
printf("Number of Bounce(s) = %d\n", numBounces);
fprintf(fp, "%f\t%f\t%f\t%f\t%f\t%f\t%f\t\n", ax, ay, x, y, vx, vy, time);
}
}
fclose(fp); //Close output file
fclose(fr); //Close input file
//system ("PAUSE");
return 0;
}
Basically, I am trying to produce accurate values so that I can see a plot of what this simulation is supposed to look like. I am assuming the logical errors have something to do with the physics. But being that my physics knowledge is limited, I am not able to see what exactly is wrong.
Here is sample input: ax: 0 ay: -9.8 x: 0 y: 50 vx: 8.66 vy: 5
Upvotes: 2
Views: 312
Reputation: 21089
It seems to me that your problem may lie in how you're implementing the kinematics equations.
//velocity[new] = velocity[old] + acc * deltaTime
vx = vx + ax*deltaTime;
vy = vy + ay*deltaTime;
//position[new] = position[old] + velocity*deltaTime + .5*acc*(deltaTime)^2
x = x + vx*deltaTime + (.5*ax*deltaTime*deltaTime);
y = y + vy*deltaTime + (.5*ay*deltaTime*deltaTime);
Two things here: you're already taking the acceleration into account in your equations for vx
and vy
, and you're using summation rather than integrated equations. The .5*ax*deltaTime*deltaTime
and .5*ay*deltaTime*deltaTime
shouldn't be included. The equation x= 0.5*a*t^2 is used when calculating the distance traveled due to a constant acceleration for the total amount of time, based on the integral of the velocity equation. As you're doing summation and already include the acceleration in your velocity equations, there's no need to include the acceleration in the position equations.
Upvotes: 1