sunshilong369
Reputation: 756
Could a object be moved if this is no `copy constructor` for the class?
Could a object be moved if this is no copy constructor for the class?In another word, is it legal that a class has move constructor whereas its copy constructor is marked as deleted.If it's ok, does it go againt the rule of three, rule of five?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 248
Answers (1)
Some programmer dude
Reputation: 409482
Yes it's perfectly legal.
Think about e.g. std::unique_ptr, which is indeed movable but not copyable.
Upvotes: 7
Related Questions
- Do I have to write a copy constructor when writing a move constructor in C++?
- Why is copy constructor called rather than move constructor?
- C++ copy, move constructors
- can I use std::move with class that doesn't provide a move constructor?
- move constructor and copy constructor in C++
- Move constructor not called
- copy-constructor called instead of move-constructor
- Move constructor bypasses copy constructor
- C++ copy constructor needed although not used
- What happens if you move an object without move constructor?