Reputation: 2731
I have a problem with implementing a merge sort algorithm in Java: I've done merge sort algorithm but it couldn't produce the right result. I also return the sorted list from the function. How can I also do it?
Here is my merge sort algorithm defined below.
mergeSort method:
public static void mergeSort(ArrayList<Person> personList, Comparator<Person> compTr) {
ArrayList<Person> helper = new ArrayList<Person>();
mergeSort(personList, helper, 0, personList.size() - 1, compTr);
}
mergeSort function:
private static void mergeSort(ArrayList<Person> list,
ArrayList<Person> helper,
int low,
int high,
Comparator<Person> compTr) {
if (low < high) {
int middle = (low + high) / 2;
mergeSort(list, helper, low, middle, compTr); //sort left half
mergeSort(list, helper, middle + 1, high, compTr); //sort right half
merge(list, helper, low, middle, high, compTr); // merge
}
}
merge algorithm:
private static void merge(ArrayList<Person> list,
ArrayList<Person> helper,
int low,
int middle,
int high,
Comparator<Person> compTr) {
//This loop throws Exception
for (int i = low; i < high + 1; i++) {
helper.add(i, list.get(i));
}
int helperLeft = low;
int helperRight = middle + 1;
int current = low;
while (helperLeft < middle && helperRight < high) {
if (isGreaterThan(helper.get(helperLeft), helper.get(helperRight), compTr)) {
list.set(current, helper.get(helperLeft));
helperLeft++;
} else {
list.set(current, helper.get(helperRight));
helperRight++;
}
current++;
}
//Copy remaining elements
int remaining = middle - helperLeft;
for (int j = 0; j <= remaining; j++) {
list.set(current + j, helper.get(helperLeft + j));
}
// RETURN LIST(list) _-> TO DO
}
Implement Comparator feature
public static boolean isGreaterThan(Person helperLeft, Person helperRight, Comparator<Person> compTr) {
return greaterThan(compTr, helperLeft, helperRight);
}
private static boolean greaterThan(Comparator comp, Person x, Person y) {
return comp.compare(x, y) > 0;
}
How can I do this?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 538
Reputation: 144780
There is no need to return the sorted array: the array is sorted in place.
Note however these problems:
the helper array should be allocated with an initial size equal to the size of the array to be sorted. This avoids the problem with helper.add(i, list.get(i));
that keeps inserting extra elements in the middle of the helper array. This is very inefficient: it requires O(n*log(n)) extra space instead of just O(n) and has a time complexity of O(nnlog(n)) which is worse than that of insertion sort.
You would allocate the helper array with
ArrayList<Person> helper = new ArrayList<Person>(personList);
and you would save the array elements with helper.set(i, list.get(i))
.
the for
loop in merge
should iterate up to and including the upper bounds:
while (helperLeft <= middle && helperRight <= high)
The convention of including the upper bound is confusing and error prone, it is much simpler to exclude the upper bounds as it removes the need for -1
/ +1
adjustments.
Here is a modified version:
public static void mergeSort(ArrayList<Person> personList, Comparator<Person> compTr) {
ArrayList<Person> helper = new ArrayList<Person>(personList);
mergeSort(personList, helper, 0, personList.size(), compTr);
}
private static void mergeSort(ArrayList<Person> list,
ArrayList<Person> helper,
int low,
int high,
Comparator<Person> compTr) {
if (high - low >= 2) {
int middle = low + (high - low) / 2;
mergeSort(list, helper, low, middle, compTr); //sort left half
mergeSort(list, helper, middle, high, compTr); //sort right half
merge(list, helper, low, middle, high, compTr); // merge
}
}
private static void merge(ArrayList<Person> list,
ArrayList<Person> helper,
int low,
int middle,
int high,
Comparator<Person> compTr) {
for (int i = low; i < high; i++) {
helper.set(i, list.get(i));
}
int helperLeft = low;
int helperRight = middle;
int current = low;
while (helperLeft < middle && helperRight < high) {
if (isGreaterThan(helper.get(helperLeft), helper.get(helperRight), compTr)) {
list.set(current, helper.get(helperLeft));
helperLeft++;
} else {
list.set(current, helper.get(helperRight));
helperRight++;
}
current++;
}
// Copy remaining elements
while (helperLeft < middle) {
list.set(current, helper.get(helperLeft));
helperLeft++;
current++;
}
}
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 2731
Here is my answer
I changed the code
while(helperLeft < middle && helperRight < high) {
to
while(helperLeft <= middle && helperRight <= high) {
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 153
I couldn't get a return value as a list from merge function
If I understand you correctly, you are looking for a way to return your sorted list. But in your implementation, you are trying to sort the original list.
That means that you already have a variable pointing to the resulting, sorted list when you call the merge funtion: the variable you use as parameter when calling
public static void mergeSort(ArrayList<Person> personList, Comparator<Person> compTr)
For example, if you have your persons in an ArrayList called "list", you are sorting this "list".
ArrayList<Person> list = new ArrayList<>();
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
list.add(new Person());
}
System.out.println(list);
mergeSort(list, Comparator.<Person>naturalOrder());
System.out.println(list);
For more information, what you are using is called a inout parameter - as in you give the function your input and receive its output over this parameter.
As pointed out in the comments there also are other problems with the code. I suspect one error is here (<= instead of <)
(helperRight <= high)
and another to be that you used a temp list in an inplace merge sort.
Here a working example can be found: How to sort in-place using the merge sort algorithm?
Upvotes: 1