Reputation: 439
If I have a Method that only takes value as an argument (not Node) called public Node finder (E val)
how can I find the respective Node regardless of the height and width of the tree. If the method took Node as an argument then it would be an easy solution to use recursion. But unfortunately I am not allowed to change the method signature. How can I do this the smart way rather than the dumb way I am trying below which would just end up with a ton of embedded if
functions
public class BinarySearchTree<E extends Comparable<E>> {
class Node {
E value;
Node leftChild = null;
Node rightChild = null;
Node(E value) {
this.value = value;
}
}
public Node finder(E val) {
if (val == null) return null;
if (root == null) return null;
boolean flag = false;
Node temp = root;
//find if Root Node matches value
if(temp.value.compareTo(val) == 0) {
flag = true;
return temp;
}
//if value is less than root check the left branch
else if (temp.value.compareTo(val) > 0) {
if(temp.leftChild.value.compareTo(val) == 0) {
flag = true;
return temp.leftChild;
}
//more if statements here
}
//if value is more than root check the right branch
else {
if(temp.rightChild.value.compareTo(val) == 0) {
flag = true;
return temp.rightChild;
}
//more if statements here
}
return null;
}
}
Upvotes: 0
Views: 1616
Reputation: 480
Binary search trees have this interesting property:
Assuming your class BinarySearchTree
holds a reference to the root, you can traverse the binary tree iteratively till you either reach the value or reach a leaf node which means your value does not exist in your binary search tree. The time complexity of this search operation is O(log(n)).
Here's some pseudocode
Find-Node(val):
node = root
while node != null:
if val == node.val then return root
if val < node.val then node = node.left
if val > node.val then node = node.right
return null
Upvotes: 7