Reputation: 2376
I have found feature comparisons but not speed comparisons.
Saxon is written in Java and I believe Zorba is written in C so one would expect Zorba to be quicker, but is it?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 1423
Reputation: 253
regarding my personal experiences, I'd claim that Saxon is much faster than Zorba in nearly all cases. However, another great XQuery processor worth looking at is BaseX (http://basex.org). It performs even better in many cases, even if no databases are created for the addressed XML documents.
Best regards, Hannes Bauer
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 3134
You can run some benchmarks here: http://xqbench.org
Since for a long time nobody answered to this post, I try to give some parts of the answer. But please consider that I am probably biased since I am working on Zorba.
First of all I try to make some general notes:
As long as you don't provide any information about your use case it is probably not possible to answer your question in a helpful way. These are questions you should probably ask yourself:
Upvotes: 3