Reputation: 249223
I have a Python generator that can call itself to get more elements to yield. It looks like this:
def gen(list):
# ...
if list:
for x in gen(list[1:]):
yield x
My question is about the last two lines: is there a more concise way to express this? I am hoping for something like this (understanding this isn't valid Python as-is):
def gen(list):
# ...
if list:
yield each in gen(list[1:])
Upvotes: 26
Views: 12931
Reputation: 18260
Python 3.3 added the yield from
keyword. Here's a comparison between what you currently have and code using the new keyword:
yield_from_test.py
:
def gen_for(a_list):
if a_list:
yield a_list[0]
for x in gen_for(a_list[1:]):
yield x
def gen_yield(a_list):
if a_list:
yield a_list[0]
yield from gen_yield(a_list[1:])
if __name__ == '__main__':
assert list(gen_for([1,2,3])) == list(gen_yield([1,2,3]))
print(list(gen_yield([1,2,3])))
» python3 yield_from_test.py
[1, 2, 3]
Upvotes: 21
Reputation: 184211
There's been some call for a yield from
or the like that "passes through" all the values returned by a subgenerator. See PEP 380 for some ideas that have been bounced around. However, nothing has been implemented yet. Your first example is correct.
Upvotes: 28
Reputation: 46607
Your code sample is very idiomatic and concise, no need and no real chance for further improvements and especially not when it comes at readability.
Upvotes: 6