CODEWITHSUNDEEP
rubyrubygemsbundler
meow
meow

Reputation: 28174

You have already activated X, but your Gemfile requires Y

When running rake I get this error:

You have already activated rake 0.9.2, but your Gemfile requires rake 0.8.7. Consider using bundle exec.

Using bundle exec rake instead of just rake seems to work, but is it the best way to fix this?

Upvotes: 201

Views: 134962

Answers (13)

lagoupo
lagoupo

Reputation: 99

gem uninstall rake -v 0.9.2

gem install rake -v 0.8.7

Upvotes: 0

ndbroadbent
ndbroadbent

Reputation: 13803

bundle exec is correct, but you don't want to be typing it every time.

You can put this in your .bashrc or .zshrc:

# Automatically invoke bundler for rake, if necessary.
rake() { if [ -e ./Gemfile.lock ]; then bundle exec rake "$@"; else /usr/bin/env rake "$@"; fi; }

Upvotes: 9

Shanto
Shanto

Reputation: 21

the error already says what to do here. as it suggests that the gemfile requires rake 0.8.7. but the other rake version is already activated. so use

gem list

command to list all the gem file. then see what gemfile you want to delete. In your case it is rake 0.9.2 . so delete this by going into the folder.

cd /var/lib/gems/3.0.0/gems

and delete the desired folder. then update the gem with this command.

bundle update

Upvotes: 1

Tomek Tomasik
Tomek Tomasik

Reputation: 31

Sometimes, for some reason, the latest versions of gems must be installed.
Sometimes, there is the need to run older projects based on older versions.
Sometimes, the fastest way to solve those kinds of problems is to delete Gemfile.lock and run bundle exec. That will generate a new Gemfile.lock with gems that we have actually installed.
If everything is working correctly, this is the easiest way.

Upvotes: 3

Ismail
Ismail

Reputation: 31

This happens when there are different version in Gemfile and Gemfile.lock, in mycase am having strscan (3.0.3) in Gemfile.lock and ruby 3.0.4 in Gemfile, just delete the Gemfile.lock and run bundle install or bundle update

Upvotes: 2

Indrajeet Gour
Indrajeet Gour

Reputation: 4510

Just used: bundle update

In my case, it solved my dependency version problem with Gemfile.lock file, it updated the packages with the latest version.

Upvotes: 7

Elijah Ayandokun
Elijah Ayandokun

Reputation: 41

You might as well want to delete the Gemfile.lock file and run bundle install or just bundle, then try again.

Upvotes: 2

qwr
qwr

Reputation: 11024

Another way to not type it every time is with a Makefile, for example

rake :
    bundle exec rake

Upvotes: 0

Oleg Dikusar
Oleg Dikusar

Reputation: 2523

Try bundle clean --force

It removes every system gem not in this bundle

Upvotes: 198

Ryan
Ryan

Reputation: 9430

If you have a reason to keep the current version of rake (or whatever other gem is causing the problem), matt is correct, the best way to do this is to run bundle exec. This uses the version specified in your Gemfile instead of using the newest version of the gem you have installed. (nathan.f77 has a good solution below if you don't want to type bundle exec every time you run rake)

Otherwise, if there is no reason not to update rake, you can run 

bundle update rake

This will actually update your Gemfile.lock to use the newest version of rake instead of having to run bundle exec every time.

Note: if you run just bundle update this will update all the gems in your Gemfile instead of just rake, which probably isn't what you want, because if something breaks in your application you won't know which gem update caused it.

The less recommended way to keep the older version without having to use bundle exec is to uninstall the newer versions of rake.

$ gem uninstall rake

Select gem to uninstall:
 1. rake-0.8.7
 2. rake-0.9.2
 3. All versions
> 2
Successfully uninstalled rake-0.9.2

This works, but if you are working with multiple apps that use different versions of rake, this can be a pain because you will find yourself constantly having to install and uninstall different versions.

Upvotes: 74

matt
matt

Reputation: 79803

Using bundle exec is the right way to do this.

Basically what's happening is that you've updated rake to 0.9.2 which now conflicts with the version specified in your Gemfile. Previously the latest version of rake you had matched the version in your Gemfile, so you didn't get any warning when simply using rake.

Yehuda Katz (one of the original Bundler developers) explains it all in this blog post.

To avoid typing bundle exec ... all the time, you could set up an alias or function in your shell for commands you commonly use with Bundler. For example this is what I use for Rake:

$ type bake
bake is a function
bake () 
{ 
    bundle exec rake "$@"
}

Upvotes: 121

nessur
nessur

Reputation: 1143

Ooh! The Katz article is excellent!

I like this solution the best:

bundle install --binstubs

so that you can now type 

bin/rake .stuff.

For someone like myself who is developing both 2.3 and 3.0.9 apps, this makes me feel a lot better.

Upvotes: 10

paarshad
paarshad

Reputation: 295

Last time that this happened to me, I had updated all my gems. I did a gem uninstall rake and it listed version options. I picked the newer one, and then I did not have to use bundle exec anymore.

Basically, if you use bundle exec it uses whatever gem version is in installed by your bundle, so what is in the Gemfile. Without bundle exec it uses whatever version is your system default.

Upvotes: 15

Related Questions