Reputation: 665
I have a simple program which creates a thread, and waits when this thread ends, and then the program also ends. When I compile this program with C(gcc) compiler, and check it with valgrind, no problem is occured, but when I compile it with C++(g++) compiler, and check with valgrind, it shows that my program has memory leaks. What could be the problem?
Here is my program,
#include <pthread.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <string.h>
unsigned char b = 0;
void* threadfunc1( void *pVoid )
{
while( b == 0 )
{
usleep(10000);
}
pthread_exit(0);
}
int main(void)
{
int status;
pthread_attr_t tattr;
pthread_t thread1;
status = pthread_attr_init(&tattr);
status = pthread_attr_setdetachstate(&tattr,PTHREAD_CREATE_JOINABLE);
status = pthread_attr_setscope(&tattr,PTHREAD_SCOPE_SYSTEM);
if( pthread_create( &thread1, &tattr, threadfunc1, NULL ) != 0 )
{
exit(1);
}
usleep(1000000);
b = 1;
pthread_join( thread1, NULL);
usleep(2000000);
return 0;
}
this is the result, when I compile it using g++, and check in valgrind
==7658== HEAP SUMMARY:
==7658== in use at exit: 28 bytes in 1 blocks
==7658== total heap usage: 2 allocs, 1 frees, 172 bytes allocated
==7658==
==7658== 28 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 1
==7658== at 0x4024C1C: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==7658== by 0x400C01E: _dl_map_object_deps (dl-deps.c:506)
==7658== by 0x40117E0: dl_open_worker (dl-open.c:297)
==7658== by 0x400D485: _dl_catch_error (dl-error.c:178)
==7658== by 0x401119F: _dl_open (dl-open.c:586)
==7658== by 0x428D0C1: do_dlopen (dl-libc.c:86)
==7658== by 0x400D485: _dl_catch_error (dl-error.c:178)
==7658== by 0x428D1C0: dlerror_run (dl-libc.c:47)
==7658== by 0x428D2DA: __libc_dlopen_mode (dl-libc.c:160)
==7658== by 0x4048876: pthread_cancel_init (unwind-forcedunwind.c:53)
==7658== by 0x40489EC: _Unwind_ForcedUnwind (unwind-forcedunwind.c:126)
==7658== by 0x40464B7: __pthread_unwind (unwind.c:130)
==7658==
==7658== LEAK SUMMARY:
==7658== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==7658== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==7658== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==7658== still reachable: 28 bytes in 1 blocks
==7658== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
So, what I'm doing wrong, is it my error or ..., why when I compile it with gcc no problems are occured and when I compile it using C++ memory leaks are present?
Upvotes: 8
Views: 925
Reputation: 206526
As @Kiril Kirov's answer already pointed out, There are no memory leaks in your program.
But I dont see a call for:
int pthread_attr_destroy(pthread_attr_t *attr);
Upvotes: 7
Reputation: 38163
Your program don't have memory leaks, you have
==7658== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==7658== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==7658== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
"still reachable" does not mean memory leak.
There are much questions here about "still reachable" by valgrind. Some of them:
Upvotes: 6