CODEWITHSUNDEEP
jquery
Emil
Emil

Reputation: 8527

Select elements in cached jQuery object

Assume we were passed the following element:

var cachedElement = $('<div><p>Some text</p></div><aside>Some more text</aside>');

If I know what is in the element, I can easily traverse it. For example, to find the div I can use:

cachedElement.filter('div');

and to find a child element I can use:

cachedElement.find('p');

What if I do not know the structure of the cached element. How can I search for an element, which can be parent, child or both.

I was wondering if there is a method that can do that for me. I do not want to wrap the element in divs and search with .find().

My best solution is the following inefficient (and ugly) selector:

cachedElement.filter('selector_string').add(cachedElement.find('selector_string')).eq(0)

In my particular case i need only the first element.

Any ideas? Thanks

Upvotes: 4

Views: 799

Answers (2)

user113716
user113716

Reputation: 322512

You could take your original approach, and make it into a plugin if you wanted something a little cleaner:

(function( $ ) {
    $.fn.inclusiveFind = function( sel ) {
        return this.filter( sel ).add( this.find( sel ) );
    } 
})( jQuery );

Then call it like any other method:

var cachedElement = $('<div><p>Some text</p></div><aside>Some more text</aside>');

var div = cachedElement.inclusiveFind( 'div' ).eq(0);
var p = cachedElement.inclusiveFind( 'p' ).eq(0);

You may get a performance improvement by using the jQuery.merge()[docs] method:

(function( $ ) {
    $.fn.inclusiveFind = function( sel ) {
        return $.merge( this.filter( sel ), this.find( sel ) );
    } 
})( jQuery );

Upvotes: 1

Felix Kling
Felix Kling

Reputation: 816700

I don't see any reason why you would not want to wrap the content in a div:

$('<div />').append(cachedElement).find('selector_string').eq(0);

You could do something like:

cachedElement.find('*').andSelf().filter('selector_string').eq(0);

This will select all descendants of cachedElement and add cachedElement. So you would have selected all the elements in one jQuery object. But that seems rather inefficient to me as well.

Upvotes: 2

Related Questions