Reputation: 5692
I want to get an ordered index values based on a vector (later I'll use this indices to sort another vector). The following code works for my purposes:
std::vector<int> order_ideal(std::vector<double> x) {
std::vector<int> idx(x.size());
std::iota(idx.begin(), idx.end(), 0);
std::sort(idx.begin(), idx.end(), [&](int i, int j){return x[i] > x[j];});
return idx;
}
But, the lambda functions cannot be used in earlier versions of GCC compiler, so I am looking for another way to implement this code without using lambda functions. I really like how [&]
captures outer environment variables. In other words, I want to use x
from the outer environment in the comparison function of std::sort()
.
Alternatively, I could make the following work but it is six times slower on my computer than the function above (and I haven't check it's earlier GCC versions compatibility):
bool isGreater(int i, int j, std::vector<double> x)
{
return x[i] > x[j];
}
std::vector<int> order_bind(std::vector<double> x)
{
std::vector<int> idx(x.size());
std::iota(idx.begin(), idx.end(), 0);
std::sort(idx.begin(), idx.end(), std::bind(isGreater, std::placeholders::_1, std::placeholders::_2, x));
return idx;
}
I somewhat understand that I need to bind these two vectors (idx
and x
together) like explained here. But I cannot implement it in this case.
Upvotes: 4
Views: 268
Reputation: 25388
The 'do it yourself' version of a capturing lambda is an object which captures the required variables manually and exposes a functor to do the actual work, something like this (please note that I have also corrected the issue Sam raised):
class Compare
{
public:
Compare (const std::vector<double> &v) : m_v (v) {}
bool operator () (int i, int j) const { return m_v [i] < m_v [j]; }
private:
const std::vector<double> &m_v;
};
std::vector<int> order_ideal(const std::vector<double>& x) {
std::vector<int> idx(x.size());
std::iota(idx.begin(), idx.end(), 0);
Compare c (x);
std::sort(idx.begin(), idx.end(), c);
return idx;
}
Upvotes: 6