CODEWITHSUNDEEP
pythonstringlistfilter
vestland
vestland

Reputation: 61134

How to retrieve partial matches from a list of strings

For approaches to retrieving partial matches in a numeric list, go to:

But if you're looking for how to retrieve partial matches for a list of strings, you'll find the best approaches concisely explained in the answer below.

SO: Python list lookup with partial match shows how to return a bool, if a list contains an element that partially matches (e.g. begins, ends, or contains) a certain string. But how can you return the element itself, instead of True or False

Example:

l = ['ones', 'twos', 'threes']
wanted = 'three'

Here, the approach in the linked question will return True using:

any(s.startswith(wanted) for s in l)

So how can you return the element 'threes' instead?

Upvotes: 31

Views: 53301

Answers (5)

Trenton McKinney
Trenton McKinney

Reputation: 62483

  • startswith and in, return a Boolean.
  • The in operator is a test of membership.
  • This can be performed with a list-comprehension or filter.
  • Using a list-comprehension, with in, is the fastest implementation tested.
  • If case is not an issue, consider mapping all the words to lowercase.
    • l = list(map(str.lower, l)).
  • Tested with python 3.11.0

filter:

  • Using filter creates a filter object, so list() is used to show all the matching values in a list.
l = ['ones', 'twos', 'threes']
wanted = 'three'

# using startswith
result = list(filter(lambda x: x.startswith(wanted), l))

# using in
result = list(filter(lambda x: wanted in x, l))

print(result)
[out]:
['threes']

list-comprehension

l = ['ones', 'twos', 'threes']
wanted = 'three'

# using startswith
result = [v for v in l if v.startswith(wanted)]

# using in
result = [v for v in l if wanted in v]

print(result)
[out]:
['threes']

Which implementation is faster?

  • Tested in Jupyter Lab using the words corpus from nltk v3.7, which has 236736 words
  • Words with 'three'
    • ['three', 'threefold', 'threefolded', 'threefoldedness', 'threefoldly', 'threefoldness', 'threeling', 'threeness', 'threepence', 'threepenny', 'threepennyworth', 'threescore', 'threesome']
from nltk.corpus import words

%timeit list(filter(lambda x: x.startswith(wanted), words.words()))
%timeit list(filter(lambda x: wanted in x, words.words()))
%timeit [v for v in words.words() if v.startswith(wanted)]
%timeit [v for v in words.words() if wanted in v]

%timeit results

62.8 ms ± 816 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)
53.8 ms ± 982 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)
56.9 ms ± 1.33 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)
47.5 ms ± 1.04 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)

Upvotes: 50

superb rain
superb rain

Reputation: 5521

I'd say the most closely related solution would be to use next instead of any:

>>> next((s for s in l if s.startswith(wanted)), 'mydefault')
'threes'
>>> next((s for s in l if s.startswith('blarg')), 'mydefault')
'mydefault'

Just like any, it stops the search as soon as it found a match, and only takes O(1) space. Unlike the list comprehension solutions, which always process the whole list and take O(n) space.

Ooh, alternatively just use any as is but remember the last checked element:

>>> if any((match := s).startswith(wanted) for s in l):
        print(match)

threes
>>> if any((match := s).startswith('blarg') for s in l):
        print(match)

>>>

Another variation, only assign the matching element:

>>> if any(s.startswith(wanted) and (match := s) for s in l):
        print(match)

threes

(Might want to include something like or True if a matching s could be the empty string.)

Upvotes: 6

CryptoFool
CryptoFool

Reputation: 23119

A simple, direct answer:

test_list = ['one', 'two','threefour']
r = [s for s in test_list if s.startswith('three')]
print(r[0] if r else 'nomatch')

Result:

threefour

Not sure what you want to do in the non-matching case. r[0] is exactly what you asked for if there is a match, but it's undefined if there is no match. The print deals with this, but you may want to do so differently.

Upvotes: 9

Ironkey
Ironkey

Reputation: 2607

this seems simple to me so i might have misread but you could just run it through a foor loop w/ an if statement;

l = ['ones', 'twos', 'threes']
wanted = 'three'

def run():
    for s in l:
        if (s.startswith(wanted)):
            return s

print(run())

output: threes

Upvotes: 5

damon
damon

Reputation: 15128

Instead of returning the result of the any() function, you can use a for-loop to look for the string instead:

def find_match(string_list, wanted):
    for string in string_list:
        if string.startswith(wanted):
            return string
    return None

>>> find_match(['ones', 'twos', 'threes'], "three")
'threes'

Upvotes: 8

Related Questions