CODEWITHSUNDEEP
wordpressdockerdocker-composevolumes
Ivan
Ivan

Reputation: 51

Docker is slow after adding volumes (Wordpress)

I would like to use Docker for local development. When I create a container with Wordpress using Docker Compose, everything loads very quickly in the browser. It's much faster than using Local by Flywheel. The problem is that I do not have access to Wordpress files. To access these files, I added volumes to docker-compose.yml:

volumes:
  - ./wp-content:/var/www/html/wp-content

I can access the files now, but everything loads so slowly in the browser that using Docker loses its meaning. Is it possible to speed it up in any way?

Upvotes: 5

Views: 4891

Answers (2)

iohnatan
iohnatan

Reputation: 21

In Windows there is a big performance hit if you set bind mounts on the Windows file system and not on the WSL file system:

volumes:
  - //wsl$/path-to/wp-content:/var/www/html/wp-content

"We recommend against working across operating systems with your files, ..... For the fastest performance speed, store your files in the WSL file system if you are working in a Linux..."

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/wsl/setup/environment?source=recommendations

"Files can be accessed across the operating systems, but it may significantly slow down performance."

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/wsl/setup/environment?source=recommendations#file-storage

Upvotes: 1

molavec
molavec

Reputation: 9137

The problem is about "consistency type" in volume. Set it up as "cached"

services:
    wordpress:

        ...

        volumes:
            - ./data:/data
            - ./scripts:/docker-entrypoint-initwp.d
            #- ./wp-content:/app/wp-content
            - type: bind
              source: ./wp-content
              target: /app/wp-content
              consistency: cached
            #- ./php-conf:/usr/local/etc/php
            - type: bind
              source: ./php-conf
              target: /usr/local/etc/php
              consistency: cached

Here for more details

Upvotes: 2

Related Questions