Reputation: 2705
I found this really weird behavior when using the JFrog CLI for downloading.
Ok let's start from uploading: When I want to upload a complete directory hierarchy, say I have this structure:
root
│
└───Folder1
└───Folder2
│ file1
│ file2
│ file3
│
└───Folder3
nested1
nested2
nested3
And I want to upload the contents of Folder2
(While my location is at root!) and all its subdirectories and files into `MyRepo/MyPath', so my repo will look like:
MyRepo
└───MyPath
│ file1
│ file2
│ file3
│
└───Folder3
nested1
nested2
nested3
If i'll try this:
jfrog rt upload --flat=false Folder1/Folder2/ MyRepo/MyPath/
I'll be left with Folder1/Folder2
in my hierarchy in Artifactory, and that's not what I want, so I use placeholders:
I'll execute the following command:
jfrog rt upload --flat=false "Folder1/Folder2/(*)" MyRepo/MyPath/{1}
That works well, and I can understand the logic: --flat=false
is so that the nested*
files will remain in the Folder3
directory, whereas the file*
files will be in the Folder2
directory, and the
placeholders say: Take whatever is in Folder1/Folder2
and copy it to MyRepo/MyPath
. Perfect!
Trying to do the inverse, i.e. download, using the same logic: Say I want to download everything under MyPath
into Folder1/Folder2
directory I'm at, so i'll get the first structure drawn above,
I try this:
jfrog rt download --flat=flase "MyRepo/MyPath/(*)" Folder1/Folder2/{1}
But that creates a really weird directory structure which I don't even want to draw here. The solution was to use flat=true
instead of flat=false
which is really unintuitive and not-understood at all. Can someone explain this behavior or at least direct me to whoever in JFrog I need to report this?
Upvotes: 1
Views: 1003
Reputation: 2425
This is indeed a bug. I have just filed this bug here - https://github.com/jfrog/jfrog-cli/issues/883
The issue is specific to the placeholders feature. JFrog CLI seems to misinterpret the correct definition of --flat, when it is used together with placeholders in the "jfrog rt download" command. I believe this issue will be worked on very soon.
Thanks a lot for sharing this!
Upvotes: 2