Reputation: 3166
Will there need to be a special release of OpenJDK to support the new Apple Silicon chips?
I see that there are currently downloads of the JDK for macOS/OS X, but these seem to only be for x86 processors. Is that correct? If so, where can I download a version of OpenJDK for the M1?
Upvotes: 294
Views: 542707
Reputation: 4501
You can install the Java JDK using sdkman (see sdkman install):
vim ~/.sdkman/etc/config
Set sdkman_rosetta2_compatible=false
(see sdkman config)
After that, you will see a list of compatible with M1 JDKs:
sdk list java
================================================================================
Available Java Versions
================================================================================
Vendor | Use | Version | Dist | Status | Identifier
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Azul Zulu | | 16.0.1 | zulu | | 16.0.1-zulu
| | 11.0.11 | zulu | | 11.0.11-zulu
| | 8.0.292 | zulu | | 8.0.292-zulu
BellSoft | | 16.0.1 | librca | | 16.0.1-librca
| | 11.0.11 | librca | | 11.0.11-librca
| | 8.0.292 | librca | | 8.0.292-librca
Java.net | | 18.ea.3 | open | | 18.ea.3-open
| | 18.ea.2 | open | | 18.ea.2-open
| | 18.ea.1 | open | | 18.ea.1-open
| | 17.ea.28 | open | | 17.ea.28-open
| | 17.ea.27 | open | | 17.ea.27-open
| | 17.ea.26 | open | | 17.ea.26-open
| | 17.ea.25 | open | | 17.ea.25-open
================================================================================
Choose one and install it using the command sdk install java IDENTIFIER
, i.e.:
sdk install java 8.0.292-zulu
Upvotes: 26
Reputation: 7922
A command line approach (thanks to the Homebrew team and the hard work of @vladimir-kempik
and other openjdk contributors on the JEP-391
branch)
# Install Homebrew
/bin/bash -c "$(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Homebrew/install/HEAD/install.sh)"
# Install OpenJDK
brew install openjdk
Verify it's installed:
$(brew --prefix openjdk)/bin/java --version
Verify it's for the arm64 hardware:
file $(brew --prefix openjdk)/bin/java
# /opt/homebrew/opt/openjdk/bin/java: Mach-O 64-bit executable arm64
Note: To install openjdk system-wide, follow the on-screen instructions provided by Homebrew.
Upvotes: 204
Reputation: 60999
brew install openjdk
In my case, after installing OpenJDK successfully on MacBook Air (M1), the java
command still did not work. I fixed it by
brew info openjdk
Then there is a command like
For the system Java wrappers to find this JDK, symlink it with
sudo ln -sfn /opt/homebrew/opt/openjdk/libexec/openjdk.jdk /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/openjdk.jdk
Execute this command and the java
command works.
Upvotes: 52
Reputation: 93
Simply use go to Java downloads and in the menu select tab "Java 18" and then tab "macOS". Download the Arm 64 DMG Installer.
You can verify whether it has worked or not by opening up the terminal and typing:
java -version
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 911
I followed the below steps and I was able to successfully run JDK 16 on a MacBook Air (M1):
I was able to install and successfully run this on my MacBook Air (M1).
Upvotes: 7
Reputation: 3853
The latest build for Mac M1's are available now
https://www.oracle.com/java/technologies/downloads/#jdk18-mac
Upvotes: 16
Reputation: 2194
I've tried the Azul JDK 8.
I just wanted to say that, while the Azul JDK works natively on Apple M1 and its speed is great, there are still issues. Especially when some Java code needs to call C++ code.
For example, I am a big data developer. And I started using the Azul JDK for my development workflow. But I noticed that certain tests started failing after the switch. For example, when the test writes to a Parquet/Avro file, it fails. I think that is because there are some native things written in C++ for Parquet/Avro, and they are not compiled for M1.
For this specific reason I am forced to use the non-M1 JDK, which is slow. There are no issues there.
Here's an example of the error that I get with Azul that I don't get with non-M1 JDKs:
- convert Base64 JSON back to rpo Avro *** FAILED ***
org.apache.spark.SparkException: Job aborted due to stage failure: Task 0 in stage 10.0 failed 1 times, most recent failure: Lost task 0.0 in stage 10.0 (TID 14, localhost, executor driver): org.xerial.snappy.SnappyError: [FAILED_TO_LOAD_NATIVE_LIBRARY] no native library is found for os.name=Mac and os.arch=aarch64
at org.xerial.snappy.SnappyLoader.findNativeLibrary(SnappyLoader.java:331)
at org.xerial.snappy.SnappyLoader.loadNativeLibrary(SnappyLoader.java:171)
at org.xerial.snappy.SnappyLoader.load(SnappyLoader.java:152)
at org.xerial.snappy.Snappy.<clinit>(Snappy.java:47)
at org.apache.avro.file.SnappyCodec.compress(SnappyCodec.java:43)
at org.apache.avro.file.DataFileStream$DataBlock.compressUsing(DataFileStream.java:358)
at org.apache.avro.file.DataFileWriter.writeBlock(DataFileWriter.java:382)
at org.apache.avro.file.DataFileWriter.sync(DataFileWriter.java:401)
at org.apache.avro.file.DataFileWriter.flush(DataFileWriter.java:410)
at org.apache.avro.file.DataFileWriter.close(DataFileWriter.java:433)
at org.apache.avro.mapred.AvroOutputFormat$1.close(AvroOutputFormat.java:170)
at org.apache.spark.internal.io.SparkHadoopWriter.close(SparkHadoopWriter.scala:101)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.PairRDDFunctions$$anonfun$saveAsHadoopDataset$1$$anonfun$12$$anonfun$apply$5.apply$mcV$sp(PairRDDFunctions.scala:1145)
at org.apache.spark.util.Utils$.tryWithSafeFinallyAndFailureCallbacks(Utils.scala:1393)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.PairRDDFunctions$$anonfun$saveAsHadoopDataset$1$$anonfun$12.apply(PairRDDFunctions.scala:1145)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.PairRDDFunctions$$anonfun$saveAsHadoopDataset$1$$anonfun$12.apply(PairRDDFunctions.scala:1125)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ResultTask.runTask(ResultTask.scala:87)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:108)
at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:335)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
Driver stacktrace:
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.DAGScheduler.org$apache$spark$scheduler$DAGScheduler$$failJobAndIndependentStages(DAGScheduler.scala:1499)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.DAGScheduler$$anonfun$abortStage$1.apply(DAGScheduler.scala:1487)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.DAGScheduler$$anonfun$abortStage$1.apply(DAGScheduler.scala:1486)
at scala.collection.mutable.ResizableArray$class.foreach(ResizableArray.scala:59)
at scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer.foreach(ArrayBuffer.scala:48)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.DAGScheduler.abortStage(DAGScheduler.scala:1486)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.DAGScheduler$$anonfun$handleTaskSetFailed$1.apply(DAGScheduler.scala:814)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.DAGScheduler$$anonfun$handleTaskSetFailed$1.apply(DAGScheduler.scala:814)
at scala.Option.foreach(Option.scala:257)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.DAGScheduler.handleTaskSetFailed(DAGScheduler.scala:814)
...
Cause: org.xerial.snappy.SnappyError: [FAILED_TO_LOAD_NATIVE_LIBRARY] no native library is found for os.name=Mac and os.arch=aarch64
at org.xerial.snappy.SnappyLoader.findNativeLibrary(SnappyLoader.java:331)
at org.xerial.snappy.SnappyLoader.loadNativeLibrary(SnappyLoader.java:171)
at org.xerial.snappy.SnappyLoader.load(SnappyLoader.java:152)
at org.xerial.snappy.Snappy.<clinit>(Snappy.java:47)
at org.apache.avro.file.SnappyCodec.compress(SnappyCodec.java:43)
at org.apache.avro.file.DataFileStream$DataBlock.compressUsing(DataFileStream.java:358)
at org.apache.avro.file.DataFileWriter.writeBlock(DataFileWriter.java:382)
at org.apache.avro.file.DataFileWriter.sync(DataFileWriter.java:401)
at org.apache.avro.file.DataFileWriter.flush(DataFileWriter.java:410)
at org.apache.avro.file.DataFileWriter.close(DataFileWriter.java:433)
As you can see, it says: Cause: org.xerial.snappy.SnappyError: [FAILED_TO_LOAD_NATIVE_LIBRARY] no native library is found for os.name=Mac and os.arch=aarch64
I googled this issue and they said that the native library is compiled for a later version of Spark, unfortunately.
This frustrated me tremendously, and I want a Windows laptop now, LOL. Running an Intel JDK on the M1 chip can be slow at times, and I don't want that.
Be careful!
Update: They released new versions of their libraries with support for M1, I updated them in the projects and everything works, thank God. Sometimes these "native code errors" manifest themselves with different exceptions and this is additional P.I.T.A. that I have to deal with while my colleagues on windows laptops don't need to deal with it. The errors can be a bit unclear sometimes, but if you see something about native code in the error log, or words like "jna" or "jni", then it's an M1 chip problem.
Upvotes: 7
Reputation: 2736
Now, OpenJDK 17 from Oracle supports the Apple M1 chip. The status of the JEP 391 is closed & delivered.
You can download the free, macOS/AArch64 open-source build of the JDK, version 17 from the official website.
Upvotes: 22
Reputation: 61
You can download the Liberica JDK from:
https://bell-sw.com/pages/downloads/?os=macOS&architecture=ARM
In IntelliJ IDEA for M1, the JetBrains Runtime is also native (ARM64).
Upvotes: 6
Reputation: 316
Here are steps to install Oracle JDK 8 and run it from Rosetta - https://www.oracle.com/in/java/technologies/javase/javase-jdk8-downloads.html
You can verify it has worked or not by opening up terminal and typing:
java -version
Upvotes: -2
Reputation: 91
Please go to the Azul site and download the .dmg file:
https://www.azul.com/downloads/zulu-community/?os=macos&architecture=arm-64-bit&package=jdk
This will be placed in a library and once IntelliJ IDEA identifies it, it should be good to run.
Upvotes: 7
Reputation: 884
Azul is offering macOS ARM builds of OpenJDK on their website in the Downloads section. I haven’t tried them out yet though, but Azul have been long-time JDK developers.
Once you unpack the Azul JDK, you have to rummage around inside of it until you find the zulu-11.jdk
directory (assuming you've downloaded JDK 11), which you then copy to /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines
.
Upvotes: 54
Reputation:
I am successfully developing Java applications on the new Apple M1 Chip with Azul OpenJDK and NetBeans.
Configuration:
Upvotes: 15
Reputation: 31
Microsoft and Azul appear to be prime movers on JEP 391 in combination with the Windows port (JEP 388). They have a separate GitHub repository that actually has an EA release for macOS-aarch64.
I am not sure what exact relationship is with the OpenJDK repository.
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 41
It's not just JEP-391.
There is a preview branch, https://github.com/openjdk/jdk-sandbox/tree/JEP-391-branch, one can build JDK 16 early-access (EA) using cross-compilation on Intel Mac or directly on ARM Mac. And it runs fine.
Upvotes: 4
Reputation: 103617
Yes.
On this page: AdoptOpenJDK Latest Releases you can select 'macOS' from the 'Operating System' dropdown, and then from 'Architecture', it's currently only x64, but soonish there should be AArch64 or ARM64 (those are usually the shortcodes for 64-bit ARM). Possibly, as Apple no doubt has a bunch of extensions built into their M1 designs, and Apple gets its own.
If you instead leave Operation System on 'any', you'll note aarch64 is in there, and this gets you to a Linux release for ARM processors. That (probably) won't run on macOS on M1 hardware, but that's 95% of the work already done.
So: It's not there yet, but note that JDKs for ARM have been available for more than decade, and whilst JDK 15 has dropped support for a bunch of exotic OS/architecture combinations (such as Solaris), ARM development has always remained at least partially relevant (even if so far it's mostly an Oracle commercial license offering). That is to say: It should not be a herculean effort to create an adoptopenjdk release that runs on M1s natively, so presumably, it will happen. But, it's an open source effort, so if you're anxious, by all means, read up and contribute :)
Apple has not given any details on this architecture whatsoever until November 10th 2020, unless you bought a development kit box for it (a Mac Mini with an A14 chip, which isn't an M1 chip, but close enough I guess), and signed a big NDA.
As a rule, open source projects will run as fast as possible in the opposite direction if you wave an NDA around, so if you dislike this state of affairs, I don't think it's wise to complain to adoptopenjdk or other packagers and open source projects about it :)
Fortunately, now it's out, and an NDA is no longer required. My assumption is that the ARM branch of the OpenJDK source code + the macOS bits that already exist for the macOS x64 release can be combined rather easily once someone with some familiarity with the OpenJDK source code has an M1-based macOS system to test it on, which should mean an adoptopenjdk macos-aarch64 release should be here within the month.
But, open source. You didn't pay them, you have no contract, and they don't owe it to you. Donate to the effort or contribute a pull request if you want it to go faster.
UPDATE:
Upvotes: 127